DSSRC Administrative Closure #16

DSSRC opened an inquiry into a multi-level marketing company regarding several business opportunity claims including aggressive, atypical income and bonus incentive claims that did not include disclosure of generally excepted results. The claims were disseminated on Facebook, in YouTube videos and on the Company website and were communicated expressly in the posts as well as through accompanying hashtags. More specifically, posts by Company distributors claimed, among other things, that Company salesforce members can turn travel into a 5 figure monthly income,” receive residual income and could earn full time income in a short time period of time.

YouTube videos were also at issue in the inquiry and included claims that “‘you don’t have to sell to make six figures,” earning potential of up to “$2,000 per month, and claims of working part time for full time income and replacing full time income. The YouTube videos also included hypothetical earning scenarios which extrapolated annual income amounts of up to $300,000.

Immediately upon receipt of the DSSRC inquiry, the direct selling company began an investigation and diligently located the source of these claims. The Company was able to trace all the wrongful claims made back to one individual. This individual was immediately notified of their direct violation of the Company’s Policies and Procedures, suspended, and instructed to remove all social media posts immediately. DSSRC independently confirmed that the YouTube videos had been disabled by the Company. Further, the Company explained to DSSRC that its Policies and Procedures and business operations are very clear that no statements may be made indicating any guaranteed or projected earnings while working for the Company.

DSSRC will continue to monitor the commitment of the Company and will re-open this matter if it is not satisfied that Company has used its best efforts to address future problematic representations.

(closed on 3/9/2020)

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends The Princeton Review Discontinue Point Increase Claims for MCAT Test Preparation Services

New York, NY – April 18, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge, the National Advertising Division recommended that The Princeton Review (TPR) discontinue claims that its students “Score a 515+ on the MCAT or add 15 points depending on your starting score. Guaranteed or your money back.”

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Trades of Hope Discontinue Salesforce Member Earnings Claims

McLean, VA – April 17, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended that Trades of Hope discontinue certain earnings claims made by salesforce members on Facebook and YouTube. 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals Discontinue “100% Pure Avocado Oil” Claim for Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil

New York, NY – April 15, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended that Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals discontinue the claim “100% Pure Avocado Oil” for its Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil and avoid conveying the unsupported message that the product is 100% pure avocado...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Finds Certain Fenty Skin Melt AWF Cleanser Performance Claims Supported; Recommends Modifications to Disclosures

New York, NY – April 12, 2024 – The National Advertising Division determined, as part of its routine monitoring program, that Fenty Skin LLC provided a reasonable basis for certain claims for its Melt AWF Jelly Oil Makeup-Melting Cleanser.

Read the Decision Summary