DSSRC Administrative Closure #220

The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (“DSSRC”) contacted a company (“Company”) regarding five social media posts disseminated on Facebook that were identified pursuant to its monitoring of the direct selling industry. The posts included references to, among other things, the Company’s “unlimited income” potential, claims that salesforce members will earn “residual income” and a statement regarding how the business opportunity can “change financial futures for generations.” One post disseminated by a salesforce member also stated that since using the Company’s product, they are now “taking less or no medications.”

DSSRC was concerned that these posts may be reasonably interpreted as communicating that Company salesforce members would earn a substantial income through its participation in the Company’s business opportunity and that Company products may be used as a substitute for prescription drug products.

Following its receipt of DSSRC’s Notice of Inquiry, the Company immediately addressed DSSRC’s concerns and was able to remove four of the posts within 72 hours. With respect to the remaining post (i.e., “unlimited income”), the Company sent out removal notification the same day that the inquiry was received from DSSRC. Unfortunately, the Company’s attempts at contacting the salesforce member were unsuccessful.  The Company then followed up with phone calls and emails on three different days. Consequently, the salesforce member’s account was officially terminated because she did not respond to the Company’s take-down requests. In further efforts to have the post removed, the Company then reported the post to Facebook.

Accordingly, DSSRC administratively closed this inquiry based upon the good faith efforts and due diligence demonstrated by the Company to address DSSRC’s self-regulatory concerns. 

(Administrative Closure #220, closed on February 24, 2022) 
© 2022 BBB National Programs

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Blueprint Test Preparation Discontinue Certain MCAT Score Improvement Claims

New York, NY – April 22, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended Blueprint Test Preparation discontinue certain express and implied claims made in connection with its four MCAT preparation courses, including claims that Blueprint students raise their MCAT scores by 15 or 13 points on average.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends The Princeton Review Discontinue Point Increase Claims for MCAT Test Preparation Services

New York, NY – April 18, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge, the National Advertising Division recommended that The Princeton Review (TPR) discontinue claims that its students “Score a 515+ on the MCAT or add 15 points depending on your starting score. Guaranteed or your money back.”

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Trades of Hope Discontinue Salesforce Member Earnings Claims

McLean, VA – April 17, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended that Trades of Hope discontinue certain earnings claims made by salesforce members on Facebook and YouTube. 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals Discontinue “100% Pure Avocado Oil” Claim for Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil

New York, NY – April 15, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended that Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals discontinue the claim “100% Pure Avocado Oil” for its Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil and avoid conveying the unsupported message that the product is 100% pure avocado...

Read the Decision Summary