DSSRC Administrative Closure #24

DSSRC inquired into a two product claims disseminated on Facebook by a distributor for a multi-level direct selling company. DSSRC expressed its concern that the social media posts conveyed unsubstantiated product claims that the Company’s products can protect against disease and the COVID-19 virus.

The Company informed DSSRC before this inquiry had been commenced that it had already initiated action against both cited violations and was successful in having one of them taken down around the same time as DSSRC’s notification was received.

The Company stated that the second post was made by an international salesforce member who was promptly suspended in September 2019 after failure to take requested actions and that it attempted to reach out again using the assistance of a local upline member, as well as contacting Facebook to report the page and seek removal of the claim. The Company explained to DSSRC that it has developed an active, daily monitoring approach to address compliance matters and that this team not only monitors daily compliance matters but is also dedicated to educating and enforcing the requirements of its Distributor Agreement and Policies and Procedures.

The Company also noted that it has been working with a third party monitoring vendor to assist in its field compliance monitoring and to further engage its members in compliance training and informed DSSRC that all company-produced business opportunity and product marketing materials, video content and website copy are reviewed by a third-party food and drug law and regulation attorney for compliance purposes before publication. 

Based upon the good faith efforts exercised by the Company to have the unauthorized posts removed, DSSRC administratively closed the inquiry. 

(closed on 5/5/2020)

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Blueprint Test Preparation Discontinue Certain MCAT Score Improvement Claims

New York, NY – April 22, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended Blueprint Test Preparation discontinue certain express and implied claims made in connection with its four MCAT preparation courses, including claims that Blueprint students raise their MCAT scores by 15 or 13 points on average.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends The Princeton Review Discontinue Point Increase Claims for MCAT Test Preparation Services

New York, NY – April 18, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge, the National Advertising Division recommended that The Princeton Review (TPR) discontinue claims that its students “Score a 515+ on the MCAT or add 15 points depending on your starting score. Guaranteed or your money back.”

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Trades of Hope Discontinue Salesforce Member Earnings Claims

McLean, VA – April 17, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended that Trades of Hope discontinue certain earnings claims made by salesforce members on Facebook and YouTube. 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals Discontinue “100% Pure Avocado Oil” Claim for Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil

New York, NY – April 15, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended that Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals discontinue the claim “100% Pure Avocado Oil” for its Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil and avoid conveying the unsupported message that the product is 100% pure avocado...

Read the Decision Summary