DSSRC Administrative Closure #34

DSSRC contacted a direct selling company regarding two Facebook posts that referenced the corona virus. The first post discussed the necessity to slow the spread of corona virus accompanied by a picture of the Company’s product. Viewers of the post are required to scroll down the screen to view language disclosing that, although the product has been proven to eliminate almost all viruses, it has not been tested against the COVID-19 virus. DSSRC expressed concern that the post could be reasonably interpreted as an implied claim that the product is effective against COVID-19 and that the disclosure was not clear and conspicuous nor in close proximity to the triggering claim.

In a second Facebook post, a member of the Company’s salesforce referenced the fears and concerns about the Coronavirus pandemic and that “CDC has stated that coronavirus may remain on surfaces for hours or days depending on surfaces. A picture of the Company’s product is featured prominently alongside the post. DSSRC again determined that it would be reasonable for consumers to interpret the claim as meaning that the subject product is effective against COVID-19. The Company acknowledged that it could not support this implied claim.

Immediately after learning about the existence of the posts, the Company contacted the salesforce members responsible for the Facebook pages and had the posts removed. The Company provided DSSRC with a detailed explanation of its internal compliance process and the steps it has taken to advise its salesforce members of statements of product performance that have not been authorized by the Company. The Company expressed it regret that the posts were not flagged by its compliance team and informed DSSRC that it was in the process of taking steps to provide additional educational resources for its salesforce team.

(closed on 06/08/20)

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals Discontinue “100% Pure Avocado Oil” Claim for Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil

New York, NY – April 15, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended that Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals discontinue the claim “100% Pure Avocado Oil” for its Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil and avoid conveying the unsupported message that the product is 100% pure avocado...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Finds Certain Fenty Skin Melt AWF Cleanser Performance Claims Supported; Recommends Modifications to Disclosures

New York, NY – April 12, 2024 – The National Advertising Division determined, as part of its routine monitoring program, that Fenty Skin LLC provided a reasonable basis for certain claims for its Melt AWF Jelly Oil Makeup-Melting Cleanser.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

BBB National Programs’ Privacy Watchdog Ensures Shein Adheres to Digital Advertising Privacy Best Practices

McLean, VA – April 11, 2024 - The Digital Advertising Accountability Program (DAAP) worked with global fast fashion retailer, Shein to bring its website and mobile apps into compliance with the Digital Advertising Alliance’s (DAA) Self-Regulatory Principles for online interest-based advertising (IBA). 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

HiSmile Appeals National Advertising Division Recommendation to Discontinue Certain Claims for its Teeth Whitening Products

New York, NY – April 11, 2024 – In a challenge brought by P&G, the National Advertising Division recommended that HiSmile PTY discontinue certain safety and comparative claims for its teeth whitening products, PAP+ Strips and V34 Color Correcting Serum.

Read the Decision Summary