DSSRC Administrative Closure #76

Social media advertising for a direct selling company that markets health and wellness products came to the attention of the Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) pursuant to its monitoring of the direct selling industry. DSSRC identified three Facebook posts that were disseminated by Company salesforce members as communicating egregious health-related claims. One post stated “build your immune system to fight virus and disease” and was accompanied by a list of several health-related conditions that the product purportedly treats (e.g., “Improve Brain Function,” “Fight Cellular Disease,” “Anti-Glycemic Activity, etc.). In addition, two separate posts implied that the product would “strengthen your immune system and protect yourself from viruses.”

DSSRC contacted the Company and noted that, unless specifically indicated otherwise, consumers can reasonably interpret general claims that a product can treat or protect against the virus as being inclusive of the coronavirus. DSSRC also noted that it is inappropriate to represent that a product or service can prevent, treat, or cure human health-related conditions unless a company possesses competent and reliable scientific evidence, including, when appropriate, well-controlled human clinical studies, substantiating that the claims are true at the time they are made. Moreover, DSSRC stated that no such study is currently known to exist for the product or its ingredients that was the subject of the inquiry.

The Company did not dispute the inaccuracy of the posts which were immediately removed after receipt of the self-regulatory inquiry. The Company noted that it would increase its compliance monitoring of social media posts to ensure that no other salesforce members disseminate similar posts and continue to educate the field about the implication of virus claims.

DSSRC expressed its appreciation to the Company for its prompt actions and, as a result of its immediate and good faith actions, administratively closed the inquiry.

(closed on 10/8/2020)

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends The Princeton Review Discontinue Point Increase Claims for MCAT Test Preparation Services

New York, NY – April 18, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge, the National Advertising Division recommended that The Princeton Review (TPR) discontinue claims that its students “Score a 515+ on the MCAT or add 15 points depending on your starting score. Guaranteed or your money back.”

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Trades of Hope Discontinue Salesforce Member Earnings Claims

McLean, VA – April 17, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended that Trades of Hope discontinue certain earnings claims made by salesforce members on Facebook and YouTube. 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals Discontinue “100% Pure Avocado Oil” Claim for Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil

New York, NY – April 15, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended that Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals discontinue the claim “100% Pure Avocado Oil” for its Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil and avoid conveying the unsupported message that the product is 100% pure avocado...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Finds Certain Fenty Skin Melt AWF Cleanser Performance Claims Supported; Recommends Modifications to Disclosures

New York, NY – April 12, 2024 – The National Advertising Division determined, as part of its routine monitoring program, that Fenty Skin LLC provided a reasonable basis for certain claims for its Melt AWF Jelly Oil Makeup-Melting Cleanser.

Read the Decision Summary