BBB National Programs National Advertising Division Recommends that Traeger Pellet Grills Discontinue Falsely Denigrating Taste Claims For Food Cooked on Propane Gas Grills

For Immediate Release

Contact: Laura Brett, Vice President, NAD

 

New York, NY – December 12, 2019 – The National Advertising Division has determined that Traeger Pellet Grills LLC’s claims that food cooked on a propane grill “tastes like gas” (or “tastes like ass”) were not puffery, but, rather, unsupported objectively provable (and falsely denigrating) taste claims and recommended that they be discontinued.  The claims for the advertiser’s Traeger Grills were made in commercials appearing on YouTube, Facebook, on its website and elsewhere, and were challenged by Char-Broil, LLC, maker of competing charcoal, gas and other grills.

NAD is an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation and is a division of the BBB NP’s self-regulatory and dispute resolution programs.

The commercial at issue depicts an interaction between a cool, confident Traeger griller using his “original wood-fired Traeger grill” and a buffoonish, bumbling neighbor using his propane gas grill. The Traeger griller points to the propane grill and asks, “Hey buddy, what flavor propane are you cooking with?!” and the neighbor responds, smiling proudly but stupidly, “GAS!” The neighbor holds up a piece of burnt, smoking meat with tongs, sniffs it and turns to his group of friends gathered on his lawn and exclaims “Smells like gas! Let’s eat!”  The Traeger griller states, “the problem with propane is that when you cook with gas, your food tastes like gas.”  However, when he explains that the “problem” with cooking with gas is that “your food tastes like . . .” he drops the “g” from gas and says “ass” instead. What follows is a series of the neighbor’s guests tasting hamburgers and hot dogs just off the gas grill and repeatedly substituting “tastes like gas” with “tastes like ass” in a variety of ways, such as “this dude cookin’ food that tastes like ass.” The Traeger griller states, “[if] you want food that doesn’t taste like gas, try it on a Traeger” and “stop making food that tastes like gas (or ‘tastes like ass’).”

The advertiser contended that its claim that food cooked on a propane grill “tastes like gas” (or “tastes like ass”) in the context of its light-hearted, over-the-top funny commercial amounts to mere puffery because it is so outrageous that no reasonable consumer would take its claims seriously.  However, NAD disagreed. NAD noted that the claim at issue here is an express one – communicated in both language and via the facial expression of the party-goers – that food cooked on a gas grill (such as Char-Broil’s) results in food that “tastes like gas” (or “tastes like ass”) – that is to say that use of propane imparts a distasteful flavor to the food. This is an inherently objectively provable claim which requires reliable taste testing as support, and NAD noted that no such evidence was provided by the advertiser.

NAD concluded that consumers will reasonably take away the message from the challenged commercial that gas/propane grills impart an undesirable flavor to food cooked on such grills because that is specifically what the challenged advertising expressly communicates – a message that Traeger acknowledges is untrue.  NAD noted that no amount of humor can rectify an expressly false claim.  Therefore, NAD concluded that the advertiser’s claims “[t]he problem with propane is that when you cook with gas, your food tastes like gas” (that food cooked on a propane grill “tastes like gas” or “tastes like ass”) were not puffery but, rather, unsupported objectively provable (and falsely denigrating) taste claims and recommended that they be discontinued.

In its advertiser’s statement, Traeger stated that it “will comply with NAD’s recommendations.”

###

About the National Advertising Division: National Advertising Division (NAD), a division of BBB National Programs, provides independent self-regulation overseeing the truthfulness of advertising across the U.S. NAD reviews national advertising in all media and its decisions set consistent standards for truth and accuracy.

About BBB National Programs: BBB National Programs fosters trust, innovation, and competition in the marketplace through the development and delivery of cost-effective, third-party self-regulation, dispute resolution and other programs. The programs were formerly administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus. BBB NP is the home of industry self-regulatory and dispute resolution programs that include the National Advertising Division (NAD), National Advertising Review Board (NARB), BBB EU Privacy Shield, BBB AUTO LINE, Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU), Children’s Food and Beverage Advertising Initiative (CFBAI), Children’s Confection Advertising Initiative (CCAI), Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC), Digital Advertising Accountability Program (Accountability Program), and the Coalition for Better Advertising Dispute Resolution Program (CBA DRM). The programs are designed to resolve business issues and advance shared objectives by responding to marketplace concerns to create a better customer experience. To learn more about industry self-regulation, please visit: BBBNP.org.

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Blueprint Test Preparation Discontinue Certain MCAT Score Improvement Claims

New York, NY – April 22, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended Blueprint Test Preparation discontinue certain express and implied claims made in connection with its four MCAT preparation courses, including claims that Blueprint students raise their MCAT scores by 15 or 13 points on average.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends The Princeton Review Discontinue Point Increase Claims for MCAT Test Preparation Services

New York, NY – April 18, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge, the National Advertising Division recommended that The Princeton Review (TPR) discontinue claims that its students “Score a 515+ on the MCAT or add 15 points depending on your starting score. Guaranteed or your money back.”

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Trades of Hope Discontinue Salesforce Member Earnings Claims

McLean, VA – April 17, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended that Trades of Hope discontinue certain earnings claims made by salesforce members on Facebook and YouTube. 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals Discontinue “100% Pure Avocado Oil” Claim for Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil

New York, NY – April 15, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended that Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals discontinue the claim “100% Pure Avocado Oil” for its Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil and avoid conveying the unsupported message that the product is 100% pure avocado...

Read the Decision Summary