T&L PerfectUSA Participates In ERSP Forum

New York, NY – Oct. 29, 2007 – The Electronic Retailing Self-Regulation Program (ERSP) has recommended that T&L Perfect USA discontinue performance and establis hment claims for the Hawaii Chair. The marketer’s advertising came to  ERSP’s attention pursuant to ERPS’s routine monitoring program.

ERSP,  the  electronic  direct-response  industry’s  self-regulatory  forum,  is  administered  by  the Council of Better Business Bureaus (CBBB) with policy oversight by the National Advertising Review Council (NARC).

Claims at issue in the ERSP inquiry included:

  • “…targets the core muscles of the body.” [the words “arms, legs, abdomen” appear on screen]
  • “…provide you with a fat burning aerobic workout.”
  • “Seniors can…improve their circulation; ease their back pain, their muscle pain, their joint pain, no matter their workout level.”
  • “Clinical tests have proven that theHawaiichair can elevate your heart rate by up to 200%” [the words ‘Clinical EKG Test’ appear on screen]

ERSP determined that tests results submitted by the marketer as evidence for its claims did not meet general standards of competent and reliable evidence. As a result, ERSP recommended the marketer  discontinue  targeted  muscle  claims  and  references  to  the  product’s  “fat-burning” capability.

The advertiser did not submit test results specifically related to the effect of the product on senior citizens. As a result, ERSP recommended that the marketer discontinue the claim that seniors can specifically benefit from the Hawaii Chair.

ERSP further recommended  that the marketer  discontinue its use of  consumer testimonials,  as well as the claim that the product is “clinically proven” to elevate one’s heart rate.

The company, in its marketer’s statement, said it would take ERSP’s recommendations into consideration “not only for the Hawaii Chair but also for our future product introductions.”

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends The Princeton Review Discontinue Point Increase Claims for MCAT Test Preparation Services

New York, NY – April 18, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge, the National Advertising Division recommended that The Princeton Review (TPR) discontinue claims that its students “Score a 515+ on the MCAT or add 15 points depending on your starting score. Guaranteed or your money back.”

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Trades of Hope Discontinue Salesforce Member Earnings Claims

McLean, VA – April 17, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended that Trades of Hope discontinue certain earnings claims made by salesforce members on Facebook and YouTube. 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals Discontinue “100% Pure Avocado Oil” Claim for Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil

New York, NY – April 15, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended that Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals discontinue the claim “100% Pure Avocado Oil” for its Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil and avoid conveying the unsupported message that the product is 100% pure avocado...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Finds Certain Fenty Skin Melt AWF Cleanser Performance Claims Supported; Recommends Modifications to Disclosures

New York, NY – April 12, 2024 – The National Advertising Division determined, as part of its routine monitoring program, that Fenty Skin LLC provided a reasonable basis for certain claims for its Melt AWF Jelly Oil Makeup-Melting Cleanser.

Read the Decision Summary