Issue Ads vs Express Advocacy: Know your compliance obligations.

Jun 1, 2021 by Digital Advertising Accountability Program

In today’s digital world, there are numerous ways that voters might encounter political content online. They might see their favorite candidate displayed in a banner on their favorite website. Alternatively, they may see their top social issue captured in a video message in their newsfeed. And of course, they might encounter organic political content shared by friends, family, and co-workers across their networks.

If you are developing a digital advertising strategy for a political campaign, no doubt you will do everything in your power to reach your relevant voters. However, be aware that you may have obligations under the Digital Advertising Alliance’s Political Advertising Principles. The Political Advertising Principles are industry best practices for digital advertising that contain express advocacy. If your ad campaign contains express advocacy, you must follow these rules.   

What is Express Advocacy?

Express advocacy is defined as “paid-for communications that unmistakably urge the election or defeat of one or more clearly identified candidate(s) for a federal or statewide election.” If an advertisement says something like “Vote for Smith” or “Re-elect Jones,” that’s express advocacy.

What is an issue ad?

Voters may also run into other kinds of political ads. For example, issue ads are a kind of political ad that focuses on broad political issues rather than specific candidates. An issue ad may contain a message advocating for a particular policy—energy conservation or tax cuts, for example—but not clearly reference any candidate running for office.

When considering your responsibilities under the DAA Principles, it’s important to distinguish between express advocacy and issue advertising. It’s easy enough to say “only express advocacy is covered,” but sometimes the lines can get a little blurry. Let’s look at some examples to illustrate the point.

 

Express Advocacy:

DAAP Political Adverising Large

 

Issue ad:

daap mountain

 

So far, so good. In the first ad, voters are called to support a specific, identified candidate for statewide office. This ad should contain enhanced notice and link viewers to a compliant notice (see the Digital Advertising Accountability Program’s other guidance blogs for details). And the second ad is clearly an issue-based advertisement. It talks about saving mountains and is paid for by a mountain protection political organization, but it does not mention any specific candidate—whether favorably or unfavorably.

Can an issue ad contain express advocacy?

In some cases, however, general issue ads can also contain express advocacy. The Political Advertising Principles indicate that a combination of words and phrases that urge action with respect to a candidate associated with an issue may serve as express advocacy. So, if your issue ad contains a message that supports or opposes a particular candidate, it may count as express advocacy under the Principles. For example:

 

daap mountain2

 

As you can see, this issue ad contains a message of express advocacy in support of the candidate George Smith. Because of this, it contains enhanced notice in the form of a Political Ads Icon AdChoices Political to meet the Principles’ requirements.

Any questions? Feel free to reach out!

If you have any questions about complying with the Political Advertising Principles or BBB National Programs, Inc.’s Digital Advertising Accountability Program, please reach out here

Suggested Articles

Blog

Old MacDonald Had an Engagement Farm: Lessons Learned from FTC v. NGL

Capturing user engagement is the foundation of internet commerce. And while the incentives to prompt greater engagement are certainly understandable, the recent NGL Labs case from the FTC raises important questions about the ethical and legal ramifications when companies try to artificially generate engagement among their userbase.
Read more
Blog

Independence Day Edition: CBPR Framework Offers “Checks & Balances”

Going, Going, Gone Global, a webinar on the CBPR Global Forum, delved into how privacy impacts businesses’ brand reputation and builds trust with key stakeholders, discussed the purpose of the Global CBPR, and its value to Global Forum members.
Read more
Blog

Industry Self-Regulation: Part of the Solution for Governing Generative AI

The spotlight on generative AI remains bright. The benefits and risks continue to be ever-present in the minds of business and political leaders. No matter the timing or the setting, the creation of transparency, accountability, and collaboration among stakeholders is key to successful industry self-regulation as is the importance of setting standards and best practices.
Read more
Blog

The Demise of “Chevron Deference”: Who Will Fill the Regulatory Gaps?

The Supreme Court's 1984 ruling in Chevron v. NRDC held that courts should defer to federal agencies’ interpretations of ambiguous federal laws so long as those interpretations are reasonable. So given the court’s decision to overturn it, where does that leave companies that want a level playing field and perhaps even to raise the bar, instead of racing to the bottom?
Read more