What Is Arbitration and What Should You Expect from It?

Nov 9, 2021 by Abby Adams, Senior Counsel, Dispute Resolution Programs, BBB AUTO LINE

Arbitration may sound mysterious to some, but it is a relatively straightforward process. Arbitration is a form of dispute resolution and is an alternative to litigation (going to court). Less formal, less costly, and less time-consuming than litigation, arbitration is an attractive option for parties who want an easy and efficient way to resolve a dispute.  

In some cases, a process called mediation will precede arbitration. For example, when a consumer begins working with the BBB AUTO LINE team to resolve a vehicle warranty or lemon law dispute, a dispute resolution specialist will work directly with both the consumer and the manufacturer in an effort to resolve the dispute through mediation. In fact, more than 60% of claims that come through AUTO LINE are resolved in mediation. But, if a dispute cannot be resolved in mediation, the claim will proceed to arbitration. 

Some of the mechanics of arbitration are comparable to litigation, such as a trial or court hearing in which each side of a dispute gets to present their side, which includes presenting evidence and testimony. But, unlike litigation, there are no formal rules of evidence, which makes it much less burdensome on the parties.

Also similar to a court hearing, there will be a “judge” evaluating each party’s side and, ultimately, making a decision on the matter. This individual is called an arbitrator. They are a neutral third-party who is usually a lawyer or someone with expertise in the matter being arbitrated. For example, an AUTO LINE arbitrator might have experience in the automotive industry.  

Arbitration hearings can be held in-person at a neutral location, virtually via teleconference, or “in-writing,” where the parties present their sides through documents only. If the hearing is conducted in-person or virtually, each party will have the opportunity to present their side orally, which includes testifying or even calling witnesses. The arbitrator will likely ask questions of the parties, too. Arbitration hearings commonly take about 60 – 90 minutes.  

After the hearing concludes and the arbitrator has had an opportunity to evaluate the case, the arbitrator will issue a written decision, in which they will decide the matter in favor of one of the parties. In the decision, the arbitrator will explain their reason for reaching the decision and may award a remedy to the prevailing party, such as reimbursement for their vehicle that was deemed a lemon. 

An arbitration award is usually binding on both parties but, in the case of BBB AUTO LINE, the consumer has the choice to accept or reject the decision. If the consumer chooses to accept the decision, it is binding on the manufacturer, meaning the manufacturer must comply with the remedy ordered by the arbitrator. If the consumer chooses to reject the decision, the case is closed with no further action. 

If you believe you have a claim eligible for arbitration under the BBB AUTO LINE program, you can get more information by going to the BBB AUTO LINE webpage for consumers so we can help you determine eligibility and navigate the claim process.

Suggested Articles

Blog

Old MacDonald Had an Engagement Farm: Lessons Learned from FTC v. NGL

Capturing user engagement is the foundation of internet commerce. And while the incentives to prompt greater engagement are certainly understandable, the recent NGL Labs case from the FTC raises important questions about the ethical and legal ramifications when companies try to artificially generate engagement among their userbase.
Read more
Blog

Independence Day Edition: CBPR Framework Offers “Checks & Balances”

Going, Going, Gone Global, a webinar on the CBPR Global Forum, delved into how privacy impacts businesses’ brand reputation and builds trust with key stakeholders, discussed the purpose of the Global CBPR, and its value to Global Forum members.
Read more
Blog

Industry Self-Regulation: Part of the Solution for Governing Generative AI

The spotlight on generative AI remains bright. The benefits and risks continue to be ever-present in the minds of business and political leaders. No matter the timing or the setting, the creation of transparency, accountability, and collaboration among stakeholders is key to successful industry self-regulation as is the importance of setting standards and best practices.
Read more
Blog

The Demise of “Chevron Deference”: Who Will Fill the Regulatory Gaps?

The Supreme Court's 1984 ruling in Chevron v. NRDC held that courts should defer to federal agencies’ interpretations of ambiguous federal laws so long as those interpretations are reasonable. So given the court’s decision to overturn it, where does that leave companies that want a level playing field and perhaps even to raise the bar, instead of racing to the bottom?
Read more