The U.S. Takes a Huge Next Step Towards GDPR Adequacy

Oct 10, 2022 by Rebecca Knight, CIPP/E, CIPP/US, Counsel, Policy, Privacy Initiatives, BBB National Programs

On October 7, 2022, President Biden signed the Executive Order On Enhancing Safeguards For United States Signals Intelligence Activities (EO), providing the legal basis for a new transatlantic data flow mechanism that will enable the $7.1 trillion economic relationship between the EU and U.S. to continue thriving. The new mechanism, EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework (DPF), was agreed upon, in principle, by President Biden and European Commission President von der Leyen in March 2022.   

BBB National Programs commended the Executive Order as a positive step in support of the more than 5,000 businesses that rely on Privacy Shield for the transfer of personal data from the EU to the U.S.   

If we break down what it said, the majority of the EO is focused on signals intelligence. The National Security Agency defines signals intelligence (SIGINT) as the collection of “foreign intelligence from communications and information systems,” which in turn, is provided “to customers across the U.S. government, such as senior civilian and military officials.” The information collected is intended to protect U.S. troops, support allies, combat terrorism, fight crime, and assist with diplomatic negotiations. The information itself is collected through a variety of means including foreign communications, radar, and other electronic systems.  

U.S. surveillance programs and activities based on SIGINT served as the Court of Justice of the European Union’s (CJEU) rationale for invalidating the previous EU-U.S. Privacy Shield framework in Schrems II, a decision issued in July 2020.  

In Schrems II, the CJEU reasoned that U.S. surveillance program activities were not limited to what is “strictly necessary” and resulted in “disproportionate interference” with the rights afforded EU citizens under the GDPR. Additionally, the CJEU reasoned there was no redress mechanism for EU subjects against U.S. authorities administering these programs. The EO is a direct response to the CJEU’s concerns.  

To address these concerns, the EO outlines the following safeguards:  

  1. Necessity and proportionate requirement: SIGINT activities should only be used after determining they are reasonable under the circumstances to achieve a legitimate objective and must not disproportionately impact the privacy or civil liberties of an individual.
  2. Legitimate objectives: SIGINT may be used to achieve one of twelve objectives targeting foreign governments, foreign organizations, or foreign individuals.
    • Protecting the national security of the U.S., allies, or partners.
    • Identifying and monitoring terrorist organizations. 
    • Determining global security threats.
    • Protecting against foreign militaries. 
    • Protecting against terrorism.
    • Protecting against intelligence activities. 
    • Protecting against weapons of mass destruction. 
    • Protecting against cybersecurity threats.
    • Protecting against threats to U.S., ally, or partner personnel. 
    • Protecting against transnational criminal threats. 
    • Protecting the integrity of elections and political processes, government property, and U.S. infrastructure. 
    • Advancing the collection or operational capabilities or activities to further one of the legitimate objectives above. 
  3. Oversight mechanisms: SIGINT activities will be subjected to rigorous oversight processes both internally (by the respective intelligence agencies) and externally (by the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board).  
  4. Redress system: Individuals claiming their personal information was improperly collected through U.S. SIGINT activities may seek redress through a multi-layer mechanism. The first layer is an investigation by the Civil Liberties Protection Officer (CLPO) in the Office of the Director of National Intelligence to determine whether any safeguards or laws were violated. The second layer is a Data Protection Review Court that provides an independent and binding review of the CLPO’s determination. 


While this is a huge step towards adequacy under the GDPR, the process has just begun. The EO will serve as the legal basis for the European Commission to make a new adequacy decision. Based on previous adequacy decisions, and if all goes to plan, the DPF will likely take effect by March 2023.  

To learn more about how we got here, and what is expected over the next few months during the EU’s adequacy decision process, read The Next Phase of Privacy Shield. And follow along as we continue to assess this Executive Order and its implications on the Privacy Shield program or sign up to receive our additional insights moving forward from the Privacy Initiatives newsletter. 

If you need support or have questions specific to your Privacy Shield status, please reach out so we can discuss your situation at  

Suggested Articles


Purpose-Driven: How To Unleash Organization And Human Capital Potential

Purpose is what moves people to take your organization to where it has never been. But how do you ensure that your employees can see their connection to purpose and know their contributions make a difference? To unleash the potential of your organization and its human capital, keep these four practices in mind.
Read more

A Cool Sweepstakes Can Get You in Hot Water

When marketing to younger consumers, contests and sweepstakes can be effective vehicles for increasing brand engagement but can also present risks and traps for brands making use of them.
Read more

The FTC Spelled Out its Priorities at NAD 2022

The FTC presentations send a strong message that it is time for national advertisers to take a hard look at their own advertising. With a strong focus on consumer protection and building consumer trust in advertising practices, companies should consider using independent self-regulation to do just that.
Read more

From Regional to Global: The CBPR System Goes Global

Recently we wrote about the objectives of the Global Forum, APEC, the APEC Framework, and the APEC CBPR System. This blog addresses the transition from the APEC CBPR System to the Global CBPR System. What are the unique benefits for participants?
Read more