Arthri-D Says it Will Discontinue Challenged Testimonials; NAD Finds no Basis for Recommending Product Name Change

New York, NY – Aug. 20, 2015 – Arthri-D, LLC, maker of the dietary supplement “Arthri-D3,” has said it will permanently discontinue challenged testimonials and an endorsement for the product that appeared at the company’s website, on YouTube and in a one-minute video endorsement spot located on both its website and YouTube channels. The claims at issue were challenged before NAD by the Council for Responsible Nutrition (CRN).

NAD is an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation and administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus. CRN files challenges with NAD in an effort to encourage manufacturers of dietary supplements to provide substantiation for their advertising claims to an objective, third-party for review and evaluation and to assure that claims being promoted to consumers are truthful, not misleading and are substantiated with credible scientific evidence.

In this case, CRN argued that the testimonials and product name overstated the product’s joint pain relief benefits.

The advertiser, in response to NAD’s initial inquiry, responded in writing that it had permanently discontinued the challenged the testimonials and endorsement. Given that representation, NAD did not review the claims on their merits.  NAD noted, though, that the voluntarily discontinued claims will be treated, for compliance purposes, as though NAD recommended their discontinuance and the advertiser agreed to comply.

The challenger further argued that the product name expressly conveyed the message that Arthri-D3 treats arthritis. NAD found that there was no intrinsic evidence of consumer confusion to warrant a recommendation that the advertiser change the product name. NAD noted that shared CRN’s concern that the name “Arthri-D3” when used in conjunction with testimonials related to relief from arthritis pain might convey the misleading message that “Arthri-D3” immediately and completely relieves arthritis pain.

However, given the advertiser’s decision to voluntarily discontinue testimonials related to relief from arthritis pain, NAD did not review the messages implied by the testimonials in combination with the product name.

The company, in its advertiser’s statement, said that it “firmly believes that self-regulation is vital to the advertising community and appreciated the opportunity to respond to, and work with, CRN and NAD on this matter.”

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Valentus Discontinue Earnings and Product Performance Claims

McLean, VA – December 23, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended Valentus, a direct selling company that sells nutritional and lifestyle products, discontinue earnings and health-related product performance claims made on social media and on the Valentus website.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Refers Olive Tree Earnings Claims to the FTC and California AG for Possible Enforcement Action

McLean, VA – December 20, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) referred Olive Tree to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and California Attorney General's Office for possible enforcement action after Olive Tree failed to respond to a DSSRC inquiry into earnings claims.  

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Children’s Advertising Review Unit Recommends JustPlay Discontinue or Modify Daisy the Yoga Goat Claims

New York, NY – December 19, 2024 - The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU) launched an investigation into advertising for Just Play’s furReal Daisy the Yoga Goat seeking to determine if the toy’s product packaging and commercial advertisements comply with CARU’s Self-Regulatory Guidelines for Children’s Advertising.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge, Oral Essentials Voluntarily Modifies “Made in USA” Claims

New York, NY – December 19, 2024 – In a National Advertising Division challenge, Oral Essentials agreed to permanently modify its claim that certain Oral Essentials oral healthcare products are “Made in USA.” 

Read the Decision Summary