National Advertising Division Recommends Byte Disclose Incentivized Reviews for Aligner Products

For Immediate Release
Contact: Abby Hills, Director of Communications, BBB National Programs

703.247.9330 / press@bbbnp.org

New York, NY – November 30, 2021 – The National Advertising Division (NAD) of BBB National Programs recommended that Straight Smile, LLC (Byte):

  • Take reasonable measures to provide clear and conspicuous disclosures informing consumers that the review was incentivized for each incentivized review on its website and on BestCompany.com; and  
  • Discontinue its advertising ranking on BestCompany.com or modify the advertising to ensure that consumers clearly understand that Best Company’s ranking is advertising for Byte and not an honest review from an independent third party.

 

The claims were challenged by SmileDirectClub, LLC. 

During the proceeding, the advertiser voluntarily discontinued or modified certain challenged claims, including claims that Byte is “#1” rated, comparative and monadic claims regarding Byte’s treatment time, claims regarding nighttime aligners, cost savings and discounts claims, claims about SmileDirectClub, and implied claims. The advertiser further agreed to modify the disclosure on its reviews page to make clear that the disclosure also applies to its video reviews and discontinued a video advertisement being shown on BestCompany.com. NAD did not review these claims on the merits. 

 

Consumer Reviews on Byte’s Website

NAD considered whether Byte properly disclosed incentivized reviews on its website, which contains both video and textual reviews from consumers and includes the small disclosure stating “We’ve asked our reviewers to share the good, the bad, and the ugly with us. These reviews may include ones where known purchasers were given free product in exchange for their honest opinions.” NAD determined that a blanket disclosure is not effective in putting consumers on notice that a review has been incentivized. NAD noted that a single, blanket disclosure tells consumers only that there may be some reviews that were incentivized and gives the consumer no way to ascertain the credibility of each review. 

Therefore, NAD concluded that Byte’s disclosure was not sufficient and recommended that the advertiser take reasonable measures to provide clear and conspicuous disclosures for each incentivized review on its website.

 

Consumer Reviews on BestCompany.com

NAD also considered whether consumer reviews posted for Byte’s products on third-party website BestCompany.com included disclosures about incentivization. Byte pays Best Company to solicit reviews and has a relationship with Best Company to promote its products. Through this relationship, Byte has ultimate responsibility for advertising claims run by Best Company on its behalf. 

NAD found that incentivized reviews that appear on BestCompany.com were solicited as part of Best Company’s relationship with Byte and thus are part of the advertising relationship between Byte and Best Company. Accordingly, NAD recommended that the advertiser take reasonable measures to provide clear and conspicuous disclosures for each incentivized review and add a clear and conspicuous disclosure to its product page on BestCompany.com citing its user reviews. 

 

BestCompany.com Ranking Claims

Among the invisible braces brands listed on BestCompany.com (which includes SmileDirectClub as well as various other competitors of Byte), BestCompany.com ranks Byte the best in several areas. Although there is a disclosure link titled “Income Disclosure” at the top of each webpage, NAD determined that the relationship between Byte and BestCompany.com is not clearly disclosed through that link because:

  • In order to see the disclosure, consumers must click on a link titled “Income Disclosure” at the top of the page;
  • The title “Income Disclosure” may not alert consumers that if they click on the link, they will learn about the relationship between BestCompany.com and the companies it is ranking and recommending; and
  • Even if consumers click on the link, the disclosure does not identify Byte but merely states that some companies may provide compensation. In addition, NAD noted that the general disclosure that some content is incentivized is not sufficient because consumers viewing Byte’s profile will not realize that this company has paid Best Company.

 

NAD further noted that Best Company rankings for the “Invisible Braces” category are influenced by the material connection between Best Company and the company ranked. For these reasons, NAD recommended that Byte discontinue its advertising ranking on BestCompany.com or modify the advertising to ensure that consumers clearly understand that Best Company’s ranking is advertising for Byte and not an honest review from an independent third party.

In its advertiser statement, Byte stated that it “will comply with NAD’s decision.” Further, the advertiser stated that while it disagrees with NAD’s views that “Byte’s relationship with Best Company was not properly disclosed” and that Best Company’s ranking of Byte “constitutes an advertising claim run on behalf of Byte,” it “respects the self-regulatory process and thanks NAD for its consideration of this matter.”

All BBB National Programs case decision summaries can be found in the case decision library. For the full text of NAD, NARB, and CARU decisions, subscribe to the online archive.

###

About BBB National Programs: BBB National Programs is where businesses turn to enhance consumer trust and consumers are heard. The non-profit organization creates a fairer playing field for businesses and a better experience for consumers through the development and delivery of effective third-party accountability and dispute resolution programs. Embracing its role as an independent organization since the restructuring of the Council of Better Business Bureaus in June 2019, BBB National Programs today oversees more than a dozen leading national industry self-regulation programs, and continues to evolve its work and grow its impact by providing business guidance and fostering best practices in arenas such as advertising, child-directed marketing, and privacy. To learn more, visit bbbprograms.org.

About the National Advertising Division: The National Advertising Division (NAD) of BBB National Programs provides independent self-regulation and dispute resolution services, guiding the truthfulness of advertising across the U.S. NAD reviews national advertising in all media and its decisions set consistent standards for advertising truth and accuracy, delivering meaningful protection to consumers and leveling the playing field for business.  

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Blueprint Test Preparation Discontinue Certain MCAT Score Improvement Claims

New York, NY – April 22, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended Blueprint Test Preparation discontinue certain express and implied claims made in connection with its four MCAT preparation courses, including claims that Blueprint students raise their MCAT scores by 15 or 13 points on average.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends The Princeton Review Discontinue Point Increase Claims for MCAT Test Preparation Services

New York, NY – April 18, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge, the National Advertising Division recommended that The Princeton Review (TPR) discontinue claims that its students “Score a 515+ on the MCAT or add 15 points depending on your starting score. Guaranteed or your money back.”

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Trades of Hope Discontinue Salesforce Member Earnings Claims

McLean, VA – April 17, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended that Trades of Hope discontinue certain earnings claims made by salesforce members on Facebook and YouTube. 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals Discontinue “100% Pure Avocado Oil” Claim for Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil

New York, NY – April 15, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended that Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals discontinue the claim “100% Pure Avocado Oil” for its Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil and avoid conveying the unsupported message that the product is 100% pure avocado...

Read the Decision Summary