CARU Examines Boy Scouts Sweepstakes Advertising, Recommends Modifications

New York, NY – Feb. 25, 2015 – The Children’s Advertising Review Unit has recommended that Boy Scouts of America (BSA) modify advertising for the “Boys Life Cybersearch Sweepstakes” to more clearly identify the odds of winning a $100 grand prize.

CARU is an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation. It is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus.

Sweepstakes advertising appeared in Boys’ Life magazine, published by BSA, and the contest was hosted at the BSA website. The advertising at issue came to the attention of CARU through CARU’s routine monitoring of advertising directed to children.

In this case, in order to comply with CARU’s Guidelines, both the print advertisement and the website needed to clearly disclose the odds of winning to children. After carefully examining the evidence, CARU determined that neither had adequate disclosures.

Although the print advertisement for the Sweepstakes contained a disclosure stating, “many will enter, one will win…” it appeared at the bottom of the page in very small type.

The website did not contain a proximate disclosure revealing the odds of winning. The web page that described the sweepstakes and where children could enter did not include a  disclosure about the odds of winning. Instead, the information was located on a separate page with the sweepstakes officials rules.

CARU has held that website disclosures must be located immediately adjacent to the promotional copy.  To comply with the CARU’s guidelines, a sweepstakes like the one in question would design the online registration process so that children would automatically view a precise description of the chances of winning before they were able to enter.

CARU recommended that future sweepstakes advertising provide the requisite disclosures in conspicuous form in all media and include a disclosure at the point of entry on websites.

BSA, in its advertiser’s statement, said that it respects CARU’s conclusions and that going forward it will use its best efforts to ensure that CARU’s recommended odds-of-winning disclosures are clearly and conspicuously displayed in print and online advertising … .

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Blueprint Test Preparation Discontinue Certain MCAT Score Improvement Claims

New York, NY – April 22, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended Blueprint Test Preparation discontinue certain express and implied claims made in connection with its four MCAT preparation courses, including claims that Blueprint students raise their MCAT scores by 15 or 13 points on average.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends The Princeton Review Discontinue Point Increase Claims for MCAT Test Preparation Services

New York, NY – April 18, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge, the National Advertising Division recommended that The Princeton Review (TPR) discontinue claims that its students “Score a 515+ on the MCAT or add 15 points depending on your starting score. Guaranteed or your money back.”

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Trades of Hope Discontinue Salesforce Member Earnings Claims

McLean, VA – April 17, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended that Trades of Hope discontinue certain earnings claims made by salesforce members on Facebook and YouTube. 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals Discontinue “100% Pure Avocado Oil” Claim for Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil

New York, NY – April 15, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended that Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals discontinue the claim “100% Pure Avocado Oil” for its Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil and avoid conveying the unsupported message that the product is 100% pure avocado...

Read the Decision Summary