CARU Recommends Bonne Bell Modify Website To Better Protect Children’s Privacy; Company Agrees To Do So

New York, NY – May 15, 2009 – The Children’s Advertising Review Unit of the Council of Better Business Bureaus (CARU) has recommended that the Bonne Bell Company implement new measures to better protect the privacy of children who visit the company’s Website at www.smackers.com.

The site came to the attention of CARU through CARU’s routine monitoring of the Internet.  CARU was directed to the Website through a television commercial for Smackers lip gloss during children’s programming. The site features Bonne Bell product information, games, cyber dolls and e-cards.

In its initial review of the site, CARU found that the site allowed children under the age of 13 to register for a customer profile in the shopping area, but required visitors to provide personally identifiable information including full name, address, and email address without first obtaining prior verifiable parental consent. CARU also found that the site allowed children under 13 to send personally identifiable information in an e-card without first obtaining prior parental consent.

CARU’s Online Privacy Protection guidelines address concerns about the collection of personal data from children and other privacy-related practices on the Internet.  CARU monitors Websites directed to children under 13 years of age, and those sites where operators know or should know that a visitor is a child under the age of 13, to evaluate their compliance with its Guidelines and the federal Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act.

CARU’s Guidelines provide that where there is a reasonable expectation that a significant number of children will be visiting a Website, the operator should employ age-screening mechanisms before collecting PII to identify children under the age of 13 and either obtain verifiable parental consent or block underage users from features where PII is collected or disclosed.

CARU determined that the site did not comply with its Guidelines with respect to age screening and recommended that the Website employ an appropriate age screening mechanism to prevent children under 13 from registering for a shopping profile. CARU further determined that the Website’s information-collection practices for its e-card feature were not in compliance with the Guidelines and COPPA.

Following CARU’s initial inquiry, the company implemented neutral age screening for its shopping profile.  stated that it would either, refrain from collecting the sender’s email address and remove the ability to freely type a message in the card’s body, or it would age screen and obtain parental consent.

The company, in its operator’s statement, said it “has worked with CARU directly to ensure the site’s compliance, and is making all suggested modifications to the www.smackers.com web site.  The Bonne Bell Company will also continue to monitor all of the sites it operates for full CARU compliance.”

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Refers Home Chef to Federal Trade Commission

New York, NY – January 13, 2025 – Based on Relish Labs, LLC d/b/a Home Chef’s failure to address compliance concerns from a previous inquiry, BBB National Program’s National Advertising Division has referred Home Chef to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in accordance with its procedures.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Refers “Made in USA” Claims by Larose Industries d/b/a Roseart and Cra-Z-Art to the Federal Trade Commission

New York, NY – January 10, 2025 – The National Advertising Division referred advertising claims by Larose Industries, operating under the names Roseart and Cra-Z-Art, that its products are “Made in USA” to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) after Larose Industries failed to respond to the inquiry.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify 20% Savings vs. ‘The Other Big Guys’ Claim; T-Mobile to Appeal

New York, NY – January 9, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its advertising to avoid conveying the comparative claim that consumers can “save 20% every month vs. the other big guys” if they subscribe to T-Mobile in markets where Spectrum Mobile also...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge Behr Voluntarily Discontinues “No Comparable Product” Claim

New York, NY – January 8, 2025 – In a National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by Benjamin Moore, Behr voluntarily discontinued its “No Comparable Product” claim.

Read the Decision Summary