CARU Recommends JAKKS Modify Broadcast Ad for Mario Kart to Better Disclose Toy’s Capabilities

New York, NY –  Jan. 15, 2016 – The Children’s Advertising Review Unit of the Council of Better Business Bureaus (CARU) has recommended that JAKKS Pacific, Inc., modify television advertising for its Mario Kart 8 Anti-Gravity RC Racer to better disclose that the toy does not make racecar sounds.

CARU is an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation. It is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus.

The advertising at issue came to CARU’s attention through its routine monitoring practices.

JAKKS Mario Kart 8 Anti-Gravity RC Racer is based on the vehicle featured in the Nintendo Mario Kart game.  The 30-second features the racer speeding through a house accompanied by the sound of a revving engine.  Following its review of the advertising, CARU determined that one reasonable take away message was that the toy was equipped to make engine noises.

The advertiser noted that an accompanying video super does state: “Sound effects added. Product makes no sound.”

CARU’s guidelines, however, provide that “Copy, sound, and visual presentations should not mislead children about a product or performance characteristics. Such characteristics may include, but are not limited to, speed, method or operation, color, sound, durability… and similar characteristics.”  The guidelines also note that advertisers should demonstrate the performance and use of a product in a way that can be duplicated by a child for whom the product is intended.

CARU recommended the advertiser modify the commercial to either eliminate the engine noises or add an audio disclosure.

JAKKS, in its advertiser’s statement, said the company “will continue to take CARU’s guidance on this and other matters into account in all of our future advertising.”

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Blueprint Test Preparation Discontinue Certain MCAT Score Improvement Claims

New York, NY – April 22, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended Blueprint Test Preparation discontinue certain express and implied claims made in connection with its four MCAT preparation courses, including claims that Blueprint students raise their MCAT scores by 15 or 13 points on average.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends The Princeton Review Discontinue Point Increase Claims for MCAT Test Preparation Services

New York, NY – April 18, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge, the National Advertising Division recommended that The Princeton Review (TPR) discontinue claims that its students “Score a 515+ on the MCAT or add 15 points depending on your starting score. Guaranteed or your money back.”

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Trades of Hope Discontinue Salesforce Member Earnings Claims

McLean, VA – April 17, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended that Trades of Hope discontinue certain earnings claims made by salesforce members on Facebook and YouTube. 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals Discontinue “100% Pure Avocado Oil” Claim for Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil

New York, NY – April 15, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended that Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals discontinue the claim “100% Pure Avocado Oil” for its Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil and avoid conveying the unsupported message that the product is 100% pure avocado...

Read the Decision Summary