CARU Recommends JAKKS Modify Broadcast Ad for Mario Kart to Better Disclose Toy’s Capabilities

New York, NY –  Jan. 15, 2016 – The Children’s Advertising Review Unit of the Council of Better Business Bureaus (CARU) has recommended that JAKKS Pacific, Inc., modify television advertising for its Mario Kart 8 Anti-Gravity RC Racer to better disclose that the toy does not make racecar sounds.

CARU is an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation. It is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus.

The advertising at issue came to CARU’s attention through its routine monitoring practices.

JAKKS Mario Kart 8 Anti-Gravity RC Racer is based on the vehicle featured in the Nintendo Mario Kart game.  The 30-second features the racer speeding through a house accompanied by the sound of a revving engine.  Following its review of the advertising, CARU determined that one reasonable take away message was that the toy was equipped to make engine noises.

The advertiser noted that an accompanying video super does state: “Sound effects added. Product makes no sound.”

CARU’s guidelines, however, provide that “Copy, sound, and visual presentations should not mislead children about a product or performance characteristics. Such characteristics may include, but are not limited to, speed, method or operation, color, sound, durability… and similar characteristics.”  The guidelines also note that advertisers should demonstrate the performance and use of a product in a way that can be duplicated by a child for whom the product is intended.

CARU recommended the advertiser modify the commercial to either eliminate the engine noises or add an audio disclosure.

JAKKS, in its advertiser’s statement, said the company “will continue to take CARU’s guidance on this and other matters into account in all of our future advertising.”

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends NuOrganic Cosmetics Discontinue Eyelash Serum Claims and Disclose Material Connections to Influencers

New York, NY – January 14, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended NuOrganic Cosmetics discontinue influencer videos containing unsupported claims for its eyelash serum, including “naturally grown long lashes,” and ensure material connections to affiliates are clearly and conspicuously...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Refers Home Chef to Federal Trade Commission

New York, NY – January 13, 2025 – Based on Relish Labs, LLC d/b/a Home Chef’s failure to address compliance concerns from a previous inquiry, BBB National Program’s National Advertising Division has referred Home Chef to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in accordance with its procedures.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Refers “Made in USA” Claims by Larose Industries d/b/a Roseart and Cra-Z-Art to the Federal Trade Commission

New York, NY – January 10, 2025 – The National Advertising Division referred advertising claims by Larose Industries, operating under the names Roseart and Cra-Z-Art, that its products are “Made in USA” to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) after Larose Industries failed to respond to the inquiry.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify 20% Savings vs. ‘The Other Big Guys’ Claim; T-Mobile to Appeal

New York, NY – January 9, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its advertising to avoid conveying the comparative claim that consumers can “save 20% every month vs. the other big guys” if they subscribe to T-Mobile in markets where Spectrum Mobile also...

Read the Decision Summary