CARU Recommends Skechers Modify Broadcast Advertising For ‘Hy-tops’ To Better Comply With CARU Guidelines

New York, NY – Nov. 23, 2009 – The Children’s Advertising Review Unit of the Council of Better Business Bureaus (CARU) has recommended that Skechers modify broadcast advertising for its    Hy-Tops sneakers to better comply with guidelines regarding product presentation.

Advertising for Skechers Hy-Tops came to the attention of CARU, the children’s advertising industry’s self-regulatory forum, through CARU’s routine monitoring.

The commercial opened with a visual of Hydee, a student, walking through the hall at school as a voiceover states “HyDee’s the girl who knows what’s cool in school.”

As the children watch HyDee, the voice over states “What’s she wearing today? Those are so cute! They’re fresh! They’re cool!”

HyDee snaps her fingers and a group of adoring girls surrounds her. She snaps them again to open her locker, which is adorned with pictures of Hy-Tops.  She snaps her fingers a third time and a nearby boy turns into a frog. The commercial closes with a picture of HyDee lying across a Skechers logo.

CARU was concerned that one reasonable takeaway message children may have after viewing the commercial is that wearing Hy-Tops will make them popular. CARU’s Self-Regulatory Program for Children’s Advertising states in part that product presentation should not “mislead children about benefits from use of the product. Such benefits may include, but are not limited to, the acquisition of status, popularity … .”

The advertiser argued that the commercial makes no express or implied claim that Hy-Tops will make anyone “cool, hot, fresh or cute.”  Further, the advertiser noted, the commercial is an animated fantasy that employs unrealistic cartoon effects.

The advertiser maintained, as well, that the circumstances surrounding the purchase of the Shoes will eliminate any possibility of confusion.  Skechers explained that due to its price point, the shoes would typically only be purchased with the aid of an adult and likely tried on prior to purchase. The advertiser noted, as well, that the company has received no consumer complaint regarding the product.

Following its review, CARU determined that children viewing the commercial might take away the message that wearing Hy-Tops will make them popular.  

In reaching its determination, CARU found the primary focus of the advertisement to be HyDee and her popularity. The commercial reinforced the connection between what children wear and their status. 

The company, in its advertiser’s statement, said it disagreed with “CARU’s characterizations of their commercial and the decision in this matter.”

However, the company said, the commercial “ended its scheduled flight and there are no plans to run it again at this time.  Therefore, in the interests of advertising self-regulation, the advertiser will comply with this decision and will take CARU’s Guidelines into consideration in future advertisements.”

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Refers Home Chef to Federal Trade Commission

New York, NY – January 13, 2025 – Based on Relish Labs, LLC d/b/a Home Chef’s failure to address compliance concerns from a previous inquiry, BBB National Program’s National Advertising Division has referred Home Chef to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in accordance with its procedures.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Refers “Made in USA” Claims by Larose Industries d/b/a Roseart and Cra-Z-Art to the Federal Trade Commission

New York, NY – January 10, 2025 – The National Advertising Division referred advertising claims by Larose Industries, operating under the names Roseart and Cra-Z-Art, that its products are “Made in USA” to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) after Larose Industries failed to respond to the inquiry.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify 20% Savings vs. ‘The Other Big Guys’ Claim; T-Mobile to Appeal

New York, NY – January 9, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its advertising to avoid conveying the comparative claim that consumers can “save 20% every month vs. the other big guys” if they subscribe to T-Mobile in markets where Spectrum Mobile also...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge Behr Voluntarily Discontinues “No Comparable Product” Claim

New York, NY – January 8, 2025 – In a National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by Benjamin Moore, Behr voluntarily discontinued its “No Comparable Product” claim.

Read the Decision Summary