CARU Reviews Advertising For SubwayFreshbuzz.com Website

New York, NY – August 6, 2008 – The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU) of the Council of Better Business Bureaus, Inc., has recommended that that Subway Franchisee Advertising Fund Trust (SFAFT), operator of the Website www.subwayfreshbuzz.com, modify the site to assure it is in compliance with CARU’s self-regulatory guidelines for children’s advertising and the federal Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA.) The operator has agreed to do so.

CARU, the children’s advertising industry’s self-regulatory forum, reviewed the Website pursuant to CARU’s ongoing monitoring program.

The Subway Website, www.subwayfreshbuzz.com, presents adult and parent-based product information, as well as information about promotions.  There is a section of the main Website devoted to a younger audience, www.subwayfreshbuzz.com/kids.

The subwayfreshbuzz.com/kids section of the Website features information about “Fresh Fit For Kids” meals, contests, “Random Acts of Fitness for Kids,” as well as television commercials featuring children.

 At the time of CARU’s review, the main site offered a click-through link from the adult section to the kid’s section and a promotion of Subway’s in-store Kid’s Pak premiums entitled “Rock Out With These Items In Each Meal.”

The premiums featured the musical act The Naked Brothers Band, which is popular with children under the age of 13.

CARU has long taken the position that, on a Website where there is a reasonable expectation that a significant number of children will be visiting, operators should employ age-screening mechanisms to determine whether verifiable parental consent or notice and opt-out is necessary.  Additionally, CARU has required that screening questions be asked in a neutral manner so as to discourage inaccurate answers from children trying to avoid parental permission requirements. 

Freshbuzz’s four hyperlinks led children to Subway’s main site where there were the following registration features, “Sign Me Up,”  the text-messaging feature, “Buzz Me,” as well as the “Subway Team,” and “Win A Trip for 4 to the 2008 Little League Baseball World Series Sweepstakes.”

For the “Sign Me Up” and “Buzz Me” features, potential members were asked to enter personally identifiable information, including full name and email address.  For the “Subway Team” and “Sweepstakes” visitors were required to submit full name, email address, street address, grade and school name. Each of these registration forms required potential members to check off a box certifying that they were “Over 13 years old.” CARU found the practice of requesting registrants to certify that they are over 13 years of age to be tantamount to providing a “tip-off” to children- a practice which is not in compliance with CARU’s Guidelines.

CARU recommended that the operator remove language that would potentially act to “tip-off” under-age children.  CARU also recommended that the Website implement neutral age-screening accompanied by a tracking mechanism at any registration area that appealed to children as well as areas of the Website that linked directly from the children’s area of the Website.   

To address CARU’s concerns, the operator committed to remove the links from the Fresh Buzz Website to the “Sign Me Up,” “Buzz Me,” and “Subway Team” features on the main site.  Additionally, SFAFT agreed to remove the “tip off” language and implemented neutral age screening at the registration area for the “Sweepstakes.”

CARU noted in its decision that it is pleased SFAFT has implemented neutral age-screening at areas of the Fresh Buzz Website that might appeal to children and that any links to registration pages on the adult-oriented Subway.com have been removed from the Fresh Buzz Website.

In it’s operator’s statement, SFAFT said it “shares CARU’s goal of protecting children online, and appreciates CARU’s important role in furthering industry best practices.”

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Lemongrass Discontinue Certain Earnings and Health-Related Product Claims

McLean, VA – May 6, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended that Lemongrass Spa Products modify or discontinue certain earnings and health-related product performance claims. 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Blueprint Test Preparation Discontinue Certain MCAT Score Improvement Claims

New York, NY – April 22, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended Blueprint Test Preparation discontinue certain express and implied claims made in connection with its four MCAT preparation courses, including claims that Blueprint students raise their MCAT scores by 15 or 13 points on average.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends The Princeton Review Discontinue Point Increase Claims for MCAT Test Preparation Services

New York, NY – April 18, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge, the National Advertising Division recommended that The Princeton Review (TPR) discontinue claims that its students “Score a 515+ on the MCAT or add 15 points depending on your starting score. Guaranteed or your money back.”

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Trades of Hope Discontinue Salesforce Member Earnings Claims

McLean, VA – April 17, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended that Trades of Hope discontinue certain earnings claims made by salesforce members on Facebook and YouTube. 

Read the Decision Summary