CARU Reviews Advertising For SubwayFreshbuzz.com Website

New York, NY – August 6, 2008 – The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU) of the Council of Better Business Bureaus, Inc., has recommended that that Subway Franchisee Advertising Fund Trust (SFAFT), operator of the Website www.subwayfreshbuzz.com, modify the site to assure it is in compliance with CARU’s self-regulatory guidelines for children’s advertising and the federal Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA.) The operator has agreed to do so.

CARU, the children’s advertising industry’s self-regulatory forum, reviewed the Website pursuant to CARU’s ongoing monitoring program.

The Subway Website, www.subwayfreshbuzz.com, presents adult and parent-based product information, as well as information about promotions.  There is a section of the main Website devoted to a younger audience, www.subwayfreshbuzz.com/kids.

The subwayfreshbuzz.com/kids section of the Website features information about “Fresh Fit For Kids” meals, contests, “Random Acts of Fitness for Kids,” as well as television commercials featuring children.

 At the time of CARU’s review, the main site offered a click-through link from the adult section to the kid’s section and a promotion of Subway’s in-store Kid’s Pak premiums entitled “Rock Out With These Items In Each Meal.”

The premiums featured the musical act The Naked Brothers Band, which is popular with children under the age of 13.

CARU has long taken the position that, on a Website where there is a reasonable expectation that a significant number of children will be visiting, operators should employ age-screening mechanisms to determine whether verifiable parental consent or notice and opt-out is necessary.  Additionally, CARU has required that screening questions be asked in a neutral manner so as to discourage inaccurate answers from children trying to avoid parental permission requirements. 

Freshbuzz’s four hyperlinks led children to Subway’s main site where there were the following registration features, “Sign Me Up,”  the text-messaging feature, “Buzz Me,” as well as the “Subway Team,” and “Win A Trip for 4 to the 2008 Little League Baseball World Series Sweepstakes.”

For the “Sign Me Up” and “Buzz Me” features, potential members were asked to enter personally identifiable information, including full name and email address.  For the “Subway Team” and “Sweepstakes” visitors were required to submit full name, email address, street address, grade and school name. Each of these registration forms required potential members to check off a box certifying that they were “Over 13 years old.” CARU found the practice of requesting registrants to certify that they are over 13 years of age to be tantamount to providing a “tip-off” to children- a practice which is not in compliance with CARU’s Guidelines.

CARU recommended that the operator remove language that would potentially act to “tip-off” under-age children.  CARU also recommended that the Website implement neutral age-screening accompanied by a tracking mechanism at any registration area that appealed to children as well as areas of the Website that linked directly from the children’s area of the Website.   

To address CARU’s concerns, the operator committed to remove the links from the Fresh Buzz Website to the “Sign Me Up,” “Buzz Me,” and “Subway Team” features on the main site.  Additionally, SFAFT agreed to remove the “tip off” language and implemented neutral age screening at the registration area for the “Sweepstakes.”

CARU noted in its decision that it is pleased SFAFT has implemented neutral age-screening at areas of the Fresh Buzz Website that might appeal to children and that any links to registration pages on the adult-oriented Subway.com have been removed from the Fresh Buzz Website.

In it’s operator’s statement, SFAFT said it “shares CARU’s goal of protecting children online, and appreciates CARU’s important role in furthering industry best practices.”

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends NuOrganic Cosmetics Discontinue Eyelash Serum Claims and Disclose Material Connections to Influencers

New York, NY – January 14, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended NuOrganic Cosmetics discontinue influencer videos containing unsupported claims for its eyelash serum, including “naturally grown long lashes,” and ensure material connections to affiliates are clearly and conspicuously...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Refers Home Chef to Federal Trade Commission

New York, NY – January 13, 2025 – Based on Relish Labs, LLC d/b/a Home Chef’s failure to address compliance concerns from a previous inquiry, BBB National Program’s National Advertising Division has referred Home Chef to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in accordance with its procedures.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Refers “Made in USA” Claims by Larose Industries d/b/a Roseart and Cra-Z-Art to the Federal Trade Commission

New York, NY – January 10, 2025 – The National Advertising Division referred advertising claims by Larose Industries, operating under the names Roseart and Cra-Z-Art, that its products are “Made in USA” to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) after Larose Industries failed to respond to the inquiry.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify 20% Savings vs. ‘The Other Big Guys’ Claim; T-Mobile to Appeal

New York, NY – January 9, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its advertising to avoid conveying the comparative claim that consumers can “save 20% every month vs. the other big guys” if they subscribe to T-Mobile in markets where Spectrum Mobile also...

Read the Decision Summary