National Advertising Review Board Finds That Charter’s Claims Referring to Specific Cable Internet Service Speeds are Not Misleading

New York, NY – July 6, 2023 – A panel of the National Advertising Review Board (NARB), the appellate advertising body of BBB National Programs, determined that Charter Communications, Inc.’s quantified speed claims do not mislead reasonable consumers. Examples of those claims include:

  • “Ultra-Fast speeds of 400 Mbps”
  • “Super-fast reliable speeds of 200 Mbps to power all your devices with no data caps”

 

The advertising at issue had been challenged at BBB National Programs’ National Advertising Division (NAD) by Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. Frontier offers residential internet service using fiber and DSL services over copper phone wire. Charter offers its residential internet service as Spectrum internet through a hybrid fiber coaxial network. 

Following NAD’s decision (Case No. 7153), Charter appealed NAD’s recommendations to qualify its speed claims to indicate whether the speed claims refer to download or upload speeds. In support of its recommendation, NAD had concluded that both download and upload speeds are material considerations for consumers when selecting an internet service provider (ISP).

A majority of the NARB panel disagreed with NAD’s recommendation in the underlying decision, crediting Charter’s argument that it has been an industry practice for approximately two decades that quantified speed references in ISP advertising communicate download speeds. Absent any evidence of consumer confusion, the NARB panel concluded the challenged quantified speed claims made by Charter do not mislead reasonable consumers. One panel member dissented and found that the quantified speed claims, in context, were ambiguous, and could convey to reasonable consumers that the “speed” reference is to both upload and download speeds.

Charter stated that it “delivers speed tier options up to 1 Gbps to all of its customers and welcomes the appellate panel’s decision to set aside NAD’s recommendation with respect to the industry-standard manner in which these speed tier options are advertised.”

All BBB National Programs case decision summaries can be found in the case decision library. For the full text of NAD, NARB, and CARU decisions, subscribe to the online archive.

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

In National Advertising Division Challenge Admire Aesthetics Voluntarily Discontinues Claims for Compounded Tirzepatide

New York, NY – January 23, 2025 – In a BBB National Programs’ National Advertising Division challenge brought by Eli Lilly, Admire Aesthetics voluntarily discontinued certain advertising claims for its compounded tirzepatide product.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Finds Certain Claims for Brainiac Applesauce and Gummy Vitamins Supported; Recommends Others be Discontinued or Modified

New York, NY – January 22, 2025 – The National Advertising Division determined that Ingenuity Brands provided a reasonable basis for certain claims for its Brainiac Brain Squeezers Applesauce products and BrainPack Daily Adult Gummy Vitamins, but recommended other claims be discontinued or...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Procter & Gamble Modify or Discontinue Certain #1 Claims for Tide Free & Gentle

New York, NY – January 17, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended that P&G modify the claim “From Tide, the #1 brand used by dermatologists” when used in connection with imagery for Tide Free & Gentle and discontinue the related claim “From Tide, the #1 Trusted Detergent Brand for Sensitive...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue “Families Can Save 20% Every Month Versus AT&T and Verizon” Claim

New York, NY – January 16, 2025 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by competitor AT&T, BBB National Programs’ National Advertising Division recommended T-Mobile discontinue its claim for 20% savings on monthly wireless services. 

Read the Decision Summary