In National Advertising Division Challenge Cincinnati Bell Voluntarily Discontinues Certain Claims for Altafiber

New York, NY – December 19, 2023 – In a BBB National Programs National Advertising Division (NAD) challenge brought by Charter Communications, Inc., Cincinnati Bell, Inc. voluntarily discontinued certain advertising claims for its altafiber that compared cable to fiber.   

The challenged claims, which appeared online and in print, included claims disparaging cable and touting the alleged superiority of fiber over cable (specifically the superiority of Cincinnati Bell over Charter) as to reliability, speed, and other performance metrics. 

Although Cincinnati Bell contended that NAD did not have jurisdiction to consider this challenge because the challenged advertising was targeted to consumers in a single market, NAD determined that it has jurisdiction over the challenged claims because the advertising appeared on the advertiser’s website and in a YouTube video, and targeted an audience that is larger than populations NAD has previously concluded were sufficiently substantial to support NAD review. In addition, the advertising at issue concerns Charter’s service, which is available nationally. 

Because Cincinnati Bell agreed to permanently discontinue all challenged express claims, and, as a result, also permanently discontinued the challenged implied claims in the context in which they appeared, NAD did not review the claims on their merits. 

In its advertiser statement, Cincinnati Bell stated that it “disagrees with NAD’s conclusion that it has jurisdiction over this matter but appreciates NAD’s recognition that Cincinnati Bell has permanently discontinued the challenged claims.”

All BBB National Programs case decision summaries can be found in the case decision library. For the full text of NAD, NARB, and CARU decisions, subscribe to the online archive. Per NAD/NARB procedures, this release shall not be used for advertising or promotional purposes.

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Valentus Discontinue Earnings and Product Performance Claims

McLean, VA – December 23, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended Valentus, a direct selling company that sells nutritional and lifestyle products, discontinue earnings and health-related product performance claims made on social media and on the Valentus website.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Refers Olive Tree Earnings Claims to the FTC and California AG for Possible Enforcement Action

McLean, VA – December 20, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) referred Olive Tree to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and California Attorney General's Office for possible enforcement action after Olive Tree failed to respond to a DSSRC inquiry into earnings claims.  

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Children’s Advertising Review Unit Recommends JustPlay Discontinue or Modify Daisy the Yoga Goat Claims

New York, NY – December 19, 2024 - The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU) launched an investigation into advertising for Just Play’s furReal Daisy the Yoga Goat seeking to determine if the toy’s product packaging and commercial advertisements comply with CARU’s Self-Regulatory Guidelines for Children’s Advertising.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge, Oral Essentials Voluntarily Modifies “Made in USA” Claims

New York, NY – December 19, 2024 – In a National Advertising Division challenge, Oral Essentials agreed to permanently modify its claim that certain Oral Essentials oral healthcare products are “Made in USA.” 

Read the Decision Summary