Online Interest-Based Advertising Accountability Program: Veruta/MyBuys, Inc.



Case Number: 02-2011


Veruta/MyBuys, Inc.


Online Interest-Based

Advertising Accountability Program


November 8, 2011


A company has responsibility to ensure that the mechanisms it employs to fulfill the

Transparency and Consumer Control Principles are fully functional.


Veruta/MyBuys, Inc. (Veruta or the company) is a provider of online retargeting and

product remarketing services.  Veruta engages in the collection and use of data for online

behavioral advertising (OBA) purposes as defined in the cross-industry Self-Regulatory

Principles for Online Behavioral Advertising (Principles):

Online Behavioral Advertising means the collection of data from a

particular computer or device regarding Web viewing behaviors over time

and across non-Affiliate Web sites for the purpose of using such data to

predict user preferences or interests to deliver advertising to that computer 2

or device based on the preferences or interests inferred from such Web

viewing behaviors.  (Principles at 9-10, Definition G.).


One of the cornerstones of the Principles is “consumer control.”  (Principles at 14,

Principle III.). A third party must provide the consumer with an easy-to-use mechanism

that allows the consumer to exercise choice regarding the collection and use of data from

his or her device for OBA purposes.  The practice at issue is whether the company was

providing consumers with choice as required under the Consumer Control Principle.

The obligation of a third party to enable a consumer to exercise choice is explained in the

Principles as follows:

A Third Party should provide consumers with the ability to exercise choice with

respect to the collection and use of data for Online Behavioral Advertising

purposes or the transfer of such data to a non-Affiliate for such purpose.  Such

choice should be available from the notice described in II.A.(2)(a); from the

industry-developed Web page(s) as set forth in II.A.2.(b)(i); or from the Third

Party’s disclosure linked to from the page where the Third Party is individually

listed as set forth in II.A.2.(b)(ii). (Principles at 14, III.A.).


On August 22, 2011, the Online Interest-Based Advertising Accountability Program

(Accountability Program) tested the functionality of the consumer choice mechanism

provided in the company’s privacy policy: “You can also choose to opt-out by clicking


Trials using five Internet browsers—Internet Explorer, Firefox, Safari, Chrome

and Opera—revealed that the link to the opt-out mechanism was missing.  Therefore, a

consumer could not initiate an opt-out request.

Repeated visits to the company’s privacy policy continued to reveal the same problem,

demonstrating that the problem was persistent and was not corrected by the company

during the month that testing was repeated.


In response to the Accountability Program’s inquiry, the company acknowledged that the

consumer choice mechanism that was ostensibly available in its privacy policy was not

functioning.  The company reported that the opt-out link was inadvertently omitted

during a software upgrade.  The company stated that upon receipt of the notice of inquiry,

it took immediate steps to correct the problem and provide the required opt-out



All companies have the obligation to monitor their data collection and advertising

practices to ensure compliance with the Principles, including ensuring that their notice

and choice mechanisms are fully functional at all times.  The Accountability Program

finds that Veruta was not compliant with the Consumer Control Principle because it

failed to exercise reasonable care to ensure that its consumer choice mechanism was

functioning properly.

Upon notification by the Accountability Program, the company promptly supplied the

link that enables the consumer to initiate an opt-out request.  The Accountability Program

has conducted subsequent tests on the opt-out mechanism on all browsers previously

tested and found the link to be active and the opt-out mechanism to be functioning as

required by the Principles.


The Accountability Program’s goal is to ensure that companies engaged in OBA comply

with the Self-Regulatory Principles.  The Accountability Program’s monitoring and

complaint processes are designed to identify areas of possible non-compliance, to make

companies aware of potential non-compliance and to work with companies to rectify noncompliance.  Veruta has implemented the Accountability Program’s recommendations

and the practice at issue has been resolved.


My Buys appreciates the opportunity to participate in the self regulatory process, and

thanks the Online Interest-Based Advertising Accountability Program for bringing this

issue, which was an unintended by-product of a software upgrade, to its attention.  We

are pleased that we were able to correct the issue promptly.4


Practice voluntarily corrected.

1. The company’s privacy policy stated, “You may choose to Opt-Out of Veruta’s services at any time; however please note that by Opting-Out, you will not be able to take full advantage of retargeted advertising or have your Veruta account login information remembered for you. To delete all cookies on your browser, simply check your browser settings to do so. By deleting your cookies in this manner, you will disable Veruta and its Partners to deliver ads that are targeted to your interests. You will have to clear your cookies each time you visit or one of our Subscriber’s websites to ensure you are not receiving retargeted advertisements. You can also choose to opt-out by clickinghere. When you Opt-Out of Veruta’s services in this manner, a cookie will be set on your browser. Veruat (sic) must maintain the cookie on your browser in order to recognize you as an Opted-Out visitor. You must Opt-Out again if you clear that cookie from your browser, use a different internet browser, or use a new computer to access the internet.”


Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.





Latest Decisions


National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify “Price Lock” Claim for 5G Home Internet Service

New York, NY – June 17, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended that T-Mobile US discontinue its “Price Lock” claim for 5G home internet service or modify the claim to explain how T-Mobile’s “Price Lock” policy differs from a “price lock” which locks the price for the term of a service.

Read the Decision Summary

National Advertising Division Recommends Agendia Modify or Discontinue Certain Claims for MammaPrint and BluePrint Breast Cancer Tests

New York, NY – June 13, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended that Agendia modify or discontinue certain claims regarding the superiority of its MammaPrint and BluePrint tests for black women, including claims that GHI’s Oncotype DX test is inappropriate for black women and that it is biased,...

Read the Decision Summary

Following National Advertising Division Challenge, Perfect Play Voluntarily Discontinues Earnings Claim for Solitaire Smash Mobile App Game

New York, NY – June 12, 2024 – Following a challenge brought by the National Advertising Division as part of its routine monitoring program, Perfect Play voluntarily discontinued the claim that consumers can win significant amounts of money by playing its Solitaire Smash mobile app game.  

Read the Decision Summary

National Advertising Division Recommends Telecom Business Solutions Modify its AI-Pro Advertising to Avoid Confusion with ChatGPT and OpenAI

New York, NY – June 11, 2024 – BBB National Programs’ National Advertising Division recommended that Telecom Business Solutions d/b/a, modify its AI-Pro advertising, which uses the terms “ChatGPT” and “GPT4,” to avoid confusion about the nature of AI-Pro’s products and services and its...

Read the Decision Summary