Online Interest-Based Advertising Accountability Program: PredictAd
ONLINE INTEREST-BASED ADVERTISING ACCOUNTABILITY PROGRAM
FORMAL REVIEW
Case Number: 04-2011
COMPANY:
PredictAd
CHALLENGER:
Online Interest-Based
Advertising Accountability Program
DECISION DATE:
November 8, 2011
SYNOPSIS
Under the Consumer Control Principle, a company is required to set an opt-out cookie
with a minimum expiration date of five years from the date on which a consumer
exercises choice.
COMPANY STATUS
PredictAd (PredictAd or the company), a browser add on, provided predictive search
suggestions and delivered ads based on its predictions¹. PredictAd appears to have
engaged in the collection and use of data for online behavioral advertising (OBA)
purposes as defined in the cross-industry Self-Regulatory Principles for Online
Behavioral Advertising (Principles):
Online Behavioral Advertising means the collection of data from a
particular computer or device regarding Web viewing behaviors over time
and across non-Affiliate Web sites for the purpose of using such data to
predict user preferences or interests to deliver advertising to that computer
or device based on the preferences or interests inferred from such Web
viewing behaviors. (Principles at 9-10, Definition G.).
OBA PRACTICE AT ISSUE
One of the cornerstones of the Principles is “consumer control.” (Principles at 14,
Principle III.). A third party must provide the consumer with an easy-to-use mechanism
that allows the consumer to exercise choice regarding the collection and use of data from
his or her device for OBA purposes. The practice at issue is whether the company was
providing consumers with choice as required under the Consumer Control Principle.
The obligation of a third party to enable a consumer to exercise choice is explained in the
Principles as follows:
A Third Party should provide consumers with the ability to exercise choice with
respect to the collection and use of data for Online Behavioral Advertising
purposes or the transfer of such data to a non-Affiliate for such purpose. Such
choice should be available from the notice described in II.A.(2)(a); from the
industry-developed Web page(s) as set forth in II.A.2.(b)(i); or from the Third
Party’s disclosure linked to from the page where the Third Party is individually
listed as set forth in II.A.2.(b)(ii). (Principles at 14, III.A.).
BASIS OF INQUIRY
On August 22, 2011, the Online Interest-Based Advertising Accountability Program
(Accountability Program) tested the functionality of the consumer choice mechanism
provided in the company’s privacy policy using five Internet browsers: Chrome, Firefox,
Internet Explorer, Opera and Safari. While the opt-out request was successfully
processed in each test, the opt-out cookie delivered to each of the browsers was set to
expire one month from the date of the test. This expiration date falls short of industry
standards.
The Principles are built on consensus standards: “The cross-industry Self-Regulatory
Program for Online Behavioral Advertising was developed by leading industry
associations to apply consumer-friendly standards to online behavioral advertising across 3
the Internet.” (Principles at 1). The industry standard for the duration of an opt-out
cookie is five years from the date of the request².
Repeated tests of the choice mechanism continued to find the short expiration date,
demonstrating that the problem was persistent and was not corrected by the company
during the month that testing was repeated.
COMPANY’S POSITION
In response to the Accountability Program’s inquiry, the company acknowledged that the
opt-out cookie delivered to the consumer’s browser contained an expiration date that did
not meet the industry standard minimum of five years. The company reported that
PredictAd was no longer an active brand and was no longer providing services to its
partners³.
The company stated that it would nonetheless change the expiration date of the
PredictAd legacy system to the five-year time frame that is the industry standard.
DECISION
All companies have the obligation to monitor their data collection and advertising
practices to ensure compliance with the Principles, including ensuring that their notice
and choice mechanisms are fully compliant with the Principles at all times. The
Accountability Program finds that PredictAd was not compliant with the Consumer
Control Principle because it failed to ensure that its consumer choice mechanism
contained an expiration date consistent with the industry standard minimum of five years.
Upon notification by the Accountability Program, the company changed the opt-out
cookie’s expiration date to five years from the date of the request. The Accountability
Program has conducted subsequent tests on the opt-out mechanism on all browsers
previously tested and found the expiration date for the opt-out cookie to meet the fiveyear minimum as required by the industry standard.
CONCLUSION
The Accountability Program’s goal is to ensure that companies engaged in OBA comply
with the Self-Regulatory Principles. The Accountability Program’s monitoring and
complaint processes are designed to identify areas of possible non-compliance, to make
companies aware of potential non-compliance and to work with companies to rectify non-
compliance. PredictAd has implemented the Accountability Program’s recommendations
and the practice at issue has been resolved.
COMPANY’S STATEMENT
Predictad is no longer an active brand/service and not proving services to its partners.
The core technology has been moved and the brand has been frozen. Nevertheless, in
order to assist with the process, the PredictAd legacy system has been updated, and
cookies now contain and expiration date of five years.
DISPOSITION OF CASE
Practice voluntarily corrected.
1 According to its CEO, PredictAd’s core technology is now being used by another company. SeeCompany’s Position below.
2 As the Aboutads.info web site explains to consumers who wish to exercise choice, “Opt out cookies storing such preferences that are placed by companies participating in the Program have a minimum five year lifespan, and remain in effect for the user’s browser unless these opt out cookies are deleted (as can happen if users deletes all of their cookies using browser tools).” See also Chitika, Inc., FTC Docket No.
C-4324 (June 7, 2011) (requiring Chitika to provide a five-year opt out).
3 But see http://www.predictad.com/sites/bloggerinstall.aspx (last visited October 30, 2011)
Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.
Latest Decisions
Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Valentus Discontinue Earnings and Product Performance Claims
McLean, VA – December 23, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended Valentus, a direct selling company that sells nutritional and lifestyle products, discontinue earnings and health-related product performance claims made on social media and on the Valentus website.
Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Refers Olive Tree Earnings Claims to the FTC and California AG for Possible Enforcement Action
McLean, VA – December 20, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) referred Olive Tree to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and California Attorney General's Office for possible enforcement action after Olive Tree failed to respond to a DSSRC inquiry into earnings claims.
Children’s Advertising Review Unit Recommends JustPlay Discontinue or Modify Daisy the Yoga Goat Claims
New York, NY – December 19, 2024 - The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU) launched an investigation into advertising for Just Play’s furReal Daisy the Yoga Goat seeking to determine if the toy’s product packaging and commercial advertisements comply with CARU’s Self-Regulatory Guidelines for Children’s Advertising.
In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge, Oral Essentials Voluntarily Modifies “Made in USA” Claims
New York, NY – December 19, 2024 – In a National Advertising Division challenge, Oral Essentials agreed to permanently modify its claim that certain Oral Essentials oral healthcare products are “Made in USA.”