SunTrust Bank Referred to the CFPB for Refusal to Participate in Self-Regulation

Accountability Program Issues Its First Government Referral

New York, NY – May 08, 2014 – The Online Interest-Based Advertising Accountability Program (Accountability Program) today referred SunTrust Bank, Inc. (SunTrust) to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau after SunTrust refused to participate in the advertising industry’s self-regulatory process. The Accountability Program uses this cooperative inquiry process to help companies understand and comply with the cross-industry Self-Regulatory Principles for Online Behavioral Advertising (OBA Principles).

As part of its ongoing monitoring and enforcement processes regarding website operators’ duty to provide consumers with transparency and control of OBA, the Accountability Program sent a letter of inquiry to SunTrust after examining the SunTrust website and observing what appeared to be third parties known to be engaged in collecting consumers’ web browsing activity in order to serve them interest-based ads.

Under the OBA Principles adopted by the U.S. advertising industry, consumers must receive real-time notice of third-party OBA data collection that links to an explanation of this activity and further links to any easy-to-use opt-out mechanism. The inquiry sought SunTrust’s cooperation in determining whether SunTrust provided this required real-time notice to consumers. SunTrust declined repeatedly to participate in the Accountability Program’s inquiry stating, “Our institution is monitored by a sizeable number of both federal and state agencies and is subject to regulatory exams and reviews on an ongoing basis.  Complying with these demands consumes all of our allocated resources.”

The OBA Principles were developed through a consensus process led by the Digital Advertising Alliance (DAA) a coalition of the major trade associations in the advertising world: the American Association of Advertising Agencies (4As), the American Advertising Association (ANA), the Direct Marketing Association (DMA), the Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB), and the Network Advertising Initiative (NAI), with the advice of the Better Business Bureau and the participation of a number of leading companies to provide a new level of transparency and consumer control, including real-time, “enhanced” notice whenever a third party is collecting a consumer’s browsing activity from different websites and using that data to serve the consumer interest-based ads. Companies are required to give consumers notice and a way to opt-out at the time third parties are collecting information on a website and when they are serving an ad based on that data. This innovative solution takes the notice previously buried in a privacy policy and serves it dynamically to the consumer as s/he browses the web.

The advertising industry incorporated accountability as one of its core principles. The Accountability Program was developed at the request of the DAA to provide independent, industry-wide enforcement of the Principles. The Accountability Program is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus, under the policy guidance of the Advertising Self-Regulatory Council. The Direct Marketing Association also serves as an accountability agent and provides accountability through its Guidelines for Ethical Business Practices.

Pursuant to its Policies and Procedures, the Accountability Program has discretion to refer any company that refuses to participate to the appropriate government agency, in this case the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Since its inception in 2011, the Accountability Program has successfully concluded 32 formal inquiries with 100 percent industry compliance with its recommendations, as well as working informally with a host of companies which have asked the Accountability Program for its guidance on compliance issues. This is its first referral.

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Refers Ardyss Earnings and Product Performance Claims to the FTC and Nevada Attorney General’s Office

McLean, VA – January 28, 2025 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) referred ArdyssLife to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Nevada Attorney General’s Office for possible enforcement action after Ardyss failed to confirm intent to comply with DSSRC recommendations to discontinue...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Olly Discontinue or Modify Certain Claims for its Kids Chillax Product; Olly to Appeal

New York, NY – January 27, 2025 – BBB National Programs’ National Advertising Division recommended that Olly discontinue or modify certain claims concerning its Kids Chillax dietary supplement’s ability to support calm and relaxed moods in children, as well as claims for Olly’s previous formulation of its Kids...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Oral Essentials Discontinue “Enamel Safe” Claim for Lumineux Whitening Mouthwash

New York, NY – January 24, 2025 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by GuruNanda, BBB National Programs’ National Advertising Division recommended that Oral Essentials discontinue the claim that its Lumineux Whitening Mouthwash is “Enamel Safe.”

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

In National Advertising Division Challenge Admire Aesthetics Voluntarily Discontinues Claims for Compounded Tirzepatide

New York, NY – January 23, 2025 – In a BBB National Programs’ National Advertising Division challenge brought by Eli Lilly, Admire Aesthetics voluntarily discontinued certain advertising claims for its compounded tirzepatide product.

Read the Decision Summary