National Advertising Division Finds Dow Jones “Cancel Anytime” Claim for Wall Street Journal Subscription Supported
New York, NY – July 26, 2023 – The National Advertising Division (NAD) of BBB National Programs determined that Dow Jones & Company, Inc. supported its claim of “cancel anytime” relating to the methods by which consumers can cancel their subscription to The Wall Street Journal (WSJ).
Through its routine monitoring program, NAD inquired about the express “cancel anytime” claim as well as the implied claim that consumers can cancel using the method with which they signed up (including online) for their WSJ subscription. Based on guidance in the Federal Trade Commission’s “Bringing Dark Patterns to Light” Report, NAD determined the claim that consumers can “cancel anytime” reasonably conveys the message that cancelling is easy and similar to the ease of subscribing.
At the time the challenge was initiated, WSJ claimed on its website that customers who subscribed online could “cancel anytime.” While WSJ offered online cancellation to certain subscribers, in certain other cases the only way a consumer could cancel their subscription was by calling WSJ.
During the proceeding, WSJ completed the planned expansion of its cancellation procedures to allow for automated online cancellations globally. The new global online cancellation procedure can be accessed directly from the website and a user can cancel one or more Dow Jones subscriptions.
Based on the revised online cancellation mechanism, NAD concluded the advertiser was able to substantiate its “cancel anytime” claim.
In its advertiser statement, Dow Jones & Company stated that it is “pleased with NAD’s recognition that The Wall Street Journal’s online cancellation process is easy, satisfies NAD’s interpretation of ‘cancel anytime,’ and meets consumer expectations.”
All BBB National Programs case decision summaries can be found in the case decision library. For the full text of NAD, NARB, and CARU decisions, subscribe to the online archive. Per NAD Procedures, this release shall not be used for advertising or promotional purposes.
Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.
Latest Decisions
Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Refers Olive Tree Earnings Claims to the FTC and California AG for Possible Enforcement Action
McLean, VA – December 20, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) referred Olive Tree to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and California Attorney General's Office for possible enforcement action after Olive Tree failed to respond to a DSSRC inquiry into earnings claims.
Children’s Advertising Review Unit Recommends JustPlay Discontinue or Modify Daisy the Yoga Goat Claims
New York, NY – December 19, 2024 - The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU) launched an investigation into advertising for Just Play’s furReal Daisy the Yoga Goat seeking to determine if the toy’s product packaging and commercial advertisements comply with CARU’s Self-Regulatory Guidelines for Children’s Advertising.
In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge, Oral Essentials Voluntarily Modifies “Made in USA” Claims
New York, NY – December 19, 2024 – In a National Advertising Division challenge, Oral Essentials agreed to permanently modify its claim that certain Oral Essentials oral healthcare products are “Made in USA.”
National Advertising Division Recommends Zuru Modify or Discontinue Certain Claims for its Rascals and Millie Moon Diapers
New York, NY – December 18, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended Zuru Edge Limited modify or discontinue certain claims for its Rascals and Millie Moon diaper products.