Flexcin International Partcipates In ERSP Forum

New York, NY – October 26, 2005 – The Electronic Retailing Self-Regulation Program (ERSP) announced that Flexcin International, Inc. (Flexcin) marketer of the Flexcin nutritional supplement, has provided support for the claim “With no side effects .”

ERSP has recommended also that the company include additional disclaimers throughout the infomercial and modify comparative claims to prescription drugs and performance claims. The marketer’s advertising was reviewed pursuant to an anonymous competitive challenge.

ERSP, the electronic direct-response industry’s self-regulatory forum supervised by the National Advertising Review Council (NARC), asked Flexcin to provide substantiation for core claims made in advertising for the Flexcin nutritional supplement, including:

“…the drugs don’t work.”
“This study shows…87.3% increase in joint function.” “…I didn’t have any pain.”
“With no side effects.”

ERSP was concerned that there are no disclaimers placed at intervals throughout the infomercial and no language that makes it clear to consumers that the results related through testimonials may be “atypical.”

ERSP determined that the comparative claims made in the current context reflect a product- performance comparison to prescription drugs and should be discontinued or modified to remove any direct or implicit references to prescription drugs. ERSP determined that the specific “effectiveness’ claim made by the spokesperson reflects her opinion and should be qualified with an appropriate disclaimer.

Further, ERSP did not agree that the single disclaimer at the beginning of the infomercial is adequate to reflect that the experiences of those offering testimonials about Flexcin are not typical. ERSP therefore recommended that additional disclaimers, close to the testimonials themselves, be added to future advertising.

Although ERSP agreed that the ingredients contained in the Flexcin nutritional supplement may have some benefits, ERSP recommended that product performance claims not specific to the ingredients be discontinued until testing on the product itself can occur. Finally, ERSP did not object to the safety claim “With no side effects” made in the advertising.

Flexcin, in its response to ERSP’s findings, said it is “very happy to have participated in the ERSP program and will be making some of the recommended changes based on ERSP.… Although we disagree that we do not make any comparisons to other drugs in the advertisement, we will take the ERSP’s recommendation into consideration and make modifications to certain parts of the advertisement…”

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Oral Essentials Discontinue "Certified Non-Toxic" Claim for its Lumineux Mouthwash

New York, NY – December 30, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by GuruNanda, the National Advertising Division recommended that Oral Essentials discontinue its claim that Lumineux mouthwash products are “Certified Non-Toxic.” 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

NARB Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify Commercial to Better Disclose Conditions of Free iPhone Offer, 20% Savings Claim

New York, NY – December 30, 2024 – A panel of the National Advertising Review Board (NARB) recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its commercial to better disclose the material conditions of its free iPhone 16 Pro offer and its 20% rate plan savings claim compared to AT&T and Verizon. 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Valentus Discontinue Earnings and Product Performance Claims

McLean, VA – December 23, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended Valentus, a direct selling company that sells nutritional and lifestyle products, discontinue earnings and health-related product performance claims made on social media and on the Valentus website.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Refers Olive Tree Earnings Claims to the FTC and California AG for Possible Enforcement Action

McLean, VA – December 20, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) referred Olive Tree to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and California Attorney General's Office for possible enforcement action after Olive Tree failed to respond to a DSSRC inquiry into earnings claims.  

Read the Decision Summary