Following AT&T Challenge, T-Mobile Says Disputed Claim Has Been Discontinued, NAD Declines to Review Claim on its Merits

New York, NY – Oct. 23, 2018 – Following a challenge by AT&T Services Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc., said a television commercial that contained the claim “Only T-Mobile lets you watch your favorite movies and shows in more places without paying more,” has completed its run and the claim has been discontinued. NAD did not review the claim on its merits.

NAD is an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation. It is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus.

AT&T had argued in its challenge that the commercial conveyed a claim of exclusivity regarding the ability of mobile customers to stream entertainment at no additional charge. Further, AT&T argued that the claim is not limited to content streamed through Netflix, but rather broadens the exclusive benefit to all “your favorite movies and shows.”

T-Mobile argued that AT&T’s challenge focused on a single line in the commercial, rather than the context of the entire commercial and contended that the commercial truthfully informed consumers that they could get a free subscription to Netflix for their family if they signed up for a T-Mobile ONE Unlimited Family Plan.

During the course of the proceeding, T-Mobile informed NAD that it had made the decision prior to AT&T’s challenge to discontinue the claim. The claim was still airing when the challenge was filed, however, and NAD retained jurisdiction.

NAD, relying on T-Mobile’s representation that the claim has been permanently discontinued, NAD did not review the claim on its merits. The voluntarily discontinued claim will be treated, for compliance purposes, as though NAD recommended its discontinuance and the advertiser agreed to comply.

T-Mobile, in its advertiser’s statement, said the company “made an independent decision to permanently discontinue the challenged claim before AT&T filed its challenge and appreciates NAD’s decision to close this matter without reviewing the claim on the merits.”

Note: A recommendation by NAD to modify or discontinue a claim is not a finding of wrongdoing and an advertiser’s voluntary discontinuance or modification of claims should not be construed as an admission of impropriety. It is the policy of NAD not to endorse any company, product, or service. Decisions finding that advertising claims have been substantiated should not be construed as endorsements.

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Valentus Discontinue Earnings and Product Performance Claims

McLean, VA – December 23, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended Valentus, a direct selling company that sells nutritional and lifestyle products, discontinue earnings and health-related product performance claims made on social media and on the Valentus website.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Refers Olive Tree Earnings Claims to the FTC and California AG for Possible Enforcement Action

McLean, VA – December 20, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) referred Olive Tree to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and California Attorney General's Office for possible enforcement action after Olive Tree failed to respond to a DSSRC inquiry into earnings claims.  

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Children’s Advertising Review Unit Recommends JustPlay Discontinue or Modify Daisy the Yoga Goat Claims

New York, NY – December 19, 2024 - The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU) launched an investigation into advertising for Just Play’s furReal Daisy the Yoga Goat seeking to determine if the toy’s product packaging and commercial advertisements comply with CARU’s Self-Regulatory Guidelines for Children’s Advertising.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge, Oral Essentials Voluntarily Modifies “Made in USA” Claims

New York, NY – December 19, 2024 – In a National Advertising Division challenge, Oral Essentials agreed to permanently modify its claim that certain Oral Essentials oral healthcare products are “Made in USA.” 

Read the Decision Summary