National Advertising Division Recommends Goose Creek Modify or Discontinue Certain Advertising Claims
New York, NY – October 31, 2023 – In a challenge brought by Bath & Body Works, LLC (B&BW), the National Advertising Division (NAD) of BBB National Programs determined that the tagline “Bath, Body & Home” was not misleading, but recommended that Goose Creek Candles, LLC:
- Discontinue certain claims regarding the ingredients found in competitor’s products.
- Discontinue the challenged claims that Goose Creek candles have longer-lasting and stronger fragrances than its competitors.
- Modify its “Made in USA” claims.
- Modify disclosures used in connection with advertising featuring actors portraying consumers.
- Require the @TheCandleChannel vlogger to disclose material connections in certain videos.
- Modify consumer posts to disclose incentivized reviews.
Ingredient Claims
NAD found that one message reasonably conveyed by Goose Creek’s “avoid the harmful chemicals found in other body care products” claim is that other competitive body care products contain harmful chemicals. NAD determined that the record did not support this claim and recommended that it be discontinued, as well as implied claims that competitors’ products contain harmful chemicals.
Fragrance Claims
NAD determined that the advertising at issue conveys the message that Goose Creek candles last longer and have a stronger fragrance than competitors. NAD found insufficient evidence to support these superiority claims and recommended the following fragrance claims by Goose Creek be discontinued:
- “When it comes to fragrance, Goose Creek beats the competition time and time again”
- “So much stronger than other store brands”
- “Stronger, longer-lasting fragrances!”
NAD also recommended that Goose Creek discontinue any advertising that implies that Goose Creek candles are stronger or longer lasting than competing candles.
Made in U.S.A. Claims
NAD recommended that Goose Creek modify its “Made in USA” claims (“poured in the USA with the highest ingredients from around the world”) to be consistent with FTC guidance and limit claims to the processes or candle ingredients that are made in the USA.
Endorsements
NAD determined that several videos across Goose Creek’s online platforms convey the message that people featured are actually consumers, not actors, who are giving their opinions. NAD recommended that any Goose Creek content featuring actors portraying consumers be modified to clearly and conspicuously disclose, in both audio and video, that actors have been employed in the videos.
Further, NAD reviewed videos posted by a candle vlogger @TheCandleChannel, who became a label designer for Goose Creek Candles in July 2023. NAD determined that Goose Creek’s relationship with @TheCandleChannel vlogger is a connection that would likely affect the weight or credibility of the endorsements and is a material connection that must be clearly and conspicuously disclosed.
For this reason, NAD recommended that Goose Creek require @TheCandleChannel to modify any video created after the date of employment with Goose Creek to include a clear and conspicuous material connection disclosure.
Consumer Reviews
B&BW challenged consumer reviews that appear on Goose Creek’s website as well as 5-star video reviews. NAD found there was no evidence that Goose Creek’s review collection process persuades consumers to leave only positive reviews and determined that Goose Creek’s review collection process incentivizes both positive and negative reviews.
However, because Goose Creek’s incentivized consumer reviews are not disclosed, NAD recommended that all consumer reviews posted or re-posted by Goose Creek be modified to include a clear and conspicuous disclosure that the review was incentivized.
Tagline
NAD determined that the tagline “Bath, Body & Home” does not convey a misleading message that equates Goose Creek products with B&BW products.
In its advertiser statement, Goose Creek stated that “while Goose Creek believes that its advertising verbiage and methods have truthfully conveyed the many benefits of its products, it appreciates the NAD’s thorough review and guidance” and “agrees to comply with the NAD’s recommendations regarding its advertising.”
All BBB National Programs case decision summaries can be found in the case decision library. For the full text of NAD, NARB, and CARU decisions, subscribe to the online archive. Per NAD/NARB procedures, this release shall not be used for advertising or promotional purposes.
Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.
Latest Decisions
NAD Recommends Charter Discontinue or Modify Spectrum Internet “Fastest Speeds in More Neighborhoods than Any Other Provider” Claim
New York, NY – October 10, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended Charter discontinue or modify the claim that “Spectrum offers the fastest speeds in more neighborhoods than any other provider” to avoid conveying the unsupported message that Charter offers the fastest speeds and is available in...
National Advertising Division Recommends Promotion in Motion Discontinue or Modify Certain Welch’s Fruit Snack Commercials
New York, NY – September 30, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended that PIM Brands discontinue certain television commercials for its Welch’s Fruit Snacks or modify the advertising to avoid conveying the message that competing fruit snacks are worthless.
Following National Advertising Division Inquiry, Google Voluntarily Unlists Video Demonstrating Google Gemini Capabilities
New York, NY – September 12, 2024 – Google voluntarily unlisted a video demonstrating the capabilities of Google Gemini, its large language model artificial intelligence (AI) offering introduced in December 2023.
National Advertising Division Recommends Gruma Modify Sugar and Net Carbohydrate Label Claims
New York, NY – September 11, 2024 – In a challenge brought by competitor Olé, the National Advertising Division found certain “zero sugar” and “0G sugar” claims supported and recommended that Gruma Corporation, in connection with its tortilla product offerings, modify or discontinue other claims.