National Advertising Division Recommends Gruma Modify Sugar and Net Carbohydrate Label Claims

New York, NY – September 11, 2024 – In a challenge brought by competitor Olé Mexican Foods, Inc., BBB National Programs’ National Advertising Division found certain “zero sugar” and “0G sugar” claims supported and recommended that Gruma Corporation, in connection with its tortilla product offerings:

  • Discontinue the “1.5G Total Fat Per Serving” claim for all of the challenged products.
  • Modify the challenged products’ net carb calculation to use total carbohydrates minus dietary fiber for the 54-gram serving size. 
  • Discontinue the “0G Sugars” and “Zero Sugar” claims for the Mission Zero Net Carb Sundried Tomato Basil Tortilla.

 

Both Olé and Gruma manufacture and sell zero net carb street-size tortillas to carb-conscious consumers.

At issue for the National Advertising Division (NAD) was whether Gruma’s Mission Zero Net Carb Tortilla Original and Sundried Tomato Basil products and Guerrero Zero Net Carb Tortillas Original – High Fiber and Chipotle - High Fiber products use a serving size that is inconsistent with Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations and industry practice. 

Based on FDA regulations, a serving size for the challenged product is three tortillas. Competitors’ label claims are based on this FDA standard serving size. Gruma based its zero net carb and other fat and sugar labeling claims on a smaller 18g, or one tortilla serving size. NAD found that consumers cannot evaluate or accurately compare the label claims on competitive products if the serving sizes among a product category are inconsistent. 

Therefore, NAD determined that the zero net carbs, zero sugar, and 1.5g fat claims based on a one tortilla serving size are misleading in a marketplace with FDA regulations specifying “per serving” calculations. 

Gruma argued that its testing supports a “zero net carbs” and “zero sugar” claim even on the FDA compliant 54-gram serving size; therefore NAD also considered the accuracy of nutrition claims regarding net carbohydrates and sugars for the 54-gram serving size. 

NAD found the “zero net carb” claim was supported and recommended that Gruma modify its net carb calculation to use total carbohydrates minus dietary fiber for the 54-gram serving size. NAD also found the “zero sugar” and “0G sugar” claims on the 54-gram serving size of the Mission and Guerrero Zero Net Carb Original and Guerrero Zero Net Carb Chipotle tortilla products were supported but recommended these claims be discontinued for the Mission Zero Net Carb Sundried Tomato Basil Tortilla.  

Further, NAD noted that the 1.5-gram total fat claim would increase with the serving size of 54 grams. Therefore, NAD did not consider the evidence to support the total fat claim and recommended that Gruma discontinue “1.5G Total Fat Per Serving” for all of the challenged products.

During the proceeding, in reliance on Gruma’s representation that it permanently discontinued the “Absolutely ZERO net carbs” claim, NAD did not review the claims on its merits and will treat the claim, for compliance purposes, as though NAD recommended it be discontinued and Gruma agreed to comply.

In its advertiser statement, Gruma stated that it agrees to comply with NAD’s recommendations. Gruma further stated that prior to this challenge “it had already determined to increase the serving size for the challenged products. In doing so, Gruma will abide by NAD’s recommendation to modify the serving size for the challenged products and the corresponding statements.”

All BBB National Programs case decision summaries can be found in the case decision library. For the full text of NAD, NARB, and CARU decisions, subscribe to the online archive. Per NAD/NARB procedures, this release shall not be used for advertising or promotional purposes.

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Finds Realtor.com “#1 Site Real Estate Professionals Trust” Claim Supported

New York, NY – November 8, 2024 – In a challenge brought by competitor CoStar Group, the National Advertising Division determined that Move provided a reasonable basis for its claim that Realtor.com is the “#1 site real estate professionals trust.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Verizon Discontinue or Modify Certain Claims for Satellite-Supported Texting Services

New York, NY – November 7, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by T-Mobile, the National Advertising Division recommended that Verizon either discontinue certain claims about satellite-supported texting services in remote locations or modify them to disclose the necessary conditions for Verizon customers...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Following National Advertising Division Challenge, PetIQ Voluntarily Discontinues Certain Claims for NextStar Flea & Tick Topical

New York, NY – November 6, 2024 – Following a National Advertising Division challenge, PetIQ discontinued certain claims for its NextStar Flea & Tick topical flea prevention and treatment product, which appeared on PetIQ’s website, social media, and third-party websites.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Finds Certain Safety Claims for Drunk Elephant Skincare Products Supported; Recommends Modification of Influencer Posts

New York, NY – November 4, 2024 – The National Advertising Division determined certain Drunk Elephant social media claims regarding skincare products being “safe for kids and tweens to use” were supported, but determined that two TikTok video influencer disclosures for Drunk Elephant's B-Goldi...

Read the Decision Summary