Formal Review 93.2019 - HyperBeard, Inc.
Company failed to participate in self-regulation
Two industry self-regulatory units today referred the mobile app developer HyperBeard to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) for failure to participate in a self-regulatory review process looking into data privacy practices related to children and advertising.
The referral follows a joint inquiry by the Online Interest-Based Advertising Accountability Program and the Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU) into HyperBeard’s compliance with the Digital Advertising Alliance’s Self-Regulatory Principles and CARU’s Self-Regulatory Guidelines, including CARU’s guidelines for Online Privacy Protection. The programs made repeated attempts to contact HyperBeard to discuss the business practices at issue but were unable to establish a line of communication with the company. Following their final attempt to reach HyperBeard, the programs initiated this joint referral to the FTC.
“It’s unfortunate that the company didn’t participate, especially given our concerns about the possible collection of data from children without parental consent,” said Jon Brescia, Director of Adjudications & Technology for the Accountability Program.
The Accountability Program and CARU inquired into HyperBeard’s practices with respect to children’s privacy during monitoring of mobile apps for compliance with the DAA Principles and CARU guidelines. During their review, the programs found that third-party companies appeared to be collecting data through HyperBeard’s app, KleptoCats, in a way that seemed to conflict with these industry standards, which include provisions modeled after the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998.
Today’s referral is the result of ongoing joint monitoring of the mobile app marketplace by CARU and the Accountability Program for compliance with their respective codes, work that both outfits have been conducting successfully for several years.
Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.
Latest Decisions
In National Advertising Division Challenge, Drip Hydration Voluntarily Discontinues Claims for its Ketamine IV Therapy
New York, NY – November 22, 2024 – Following a challenge brought by the National Advertising Division as part of its routine monitoring program, Drip Hydration voluntarily discontinued advertising claims for its Drip Hydration Ketamine IV Therapy.
NAD Finds Patented and Safety Claims for POOPH’s Pet Odor & Stain Eliminator Supported; Recommends Other Claims Be Modified or Discontinued
New York, NY – November 21, 2024 – The National Advertising Division determined that Ikigai supported patented and safety claims for their POOPH Pet Odor & Stain Eliminator, but recommended that other claims, including claims that POOPH eliminates odors and strains, be discontinued.
National Advertising Division Recommends SharkNinja Discontinue Certain Best Deep Carpet Cleaning Claims
New York, NY – November 19, 2024 – BBB National Programs’ National Advertising Division recommended that SharkNinja discontinue the claim “The Best Deep Carpet Cleaning Among Full-Sized Deep Carpet Cleaners** Based on ASTM F2828 vs. full-sized carpet cleaners above 14 lbs.”
National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify Advertising for Free iPhone and 20% Savings Claim; T-Mobile to Appeal
New York, NY – November 18, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge, the National Advertising Division recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its advertising offering a free iPhone and 20% savings on monthly wireless services to better disclose the material conditions of the offer.