Formal Review 93.2019 - HyperBeard, Inc.

Company failed to participate in self-regulation

Two industry self-regulatory units today referred the mobile app developer HyperBeard to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) for failure to participate in a self-regulatory review process looking into data privacy practices related to children and advertising.

The referral follows a joint inquiry by the Online Interest-Based Advertising Accountability Program and the Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU) into HyperBeard’s compliance with the Digital Advertising Alliance’s Self-Regulatory Principles and CARU’s Self-Regulatory Guidelines, including CARU’s guidelines for Online Privacy Protection. The programs made repeated attempts to contact HyperBeard to discuss the business practices at issue but were unable to establish a line of communication with the company. Following their final attempt to reach HyperBeard, the programs initiated this joint referral to the FTC.

“It’s unfortunate that the company didn’t participate, especially given our concerns about the possible collection of data from children without parental consent,” said Jon Brescia, Director of Adjudications & Technology for the Accountability Program. 

The Accountability Program and CARU inquired into HyperBeard’s practices with respect to children’s privacy during monitoring of mobile apps for compliance with the DAA Principles and CARU guidelines. During their review, the programs found that third-party companies appeared to be collecting data through HyperBeard’s app, KleptoCats, in a way that seemed to conflict with these industry standards, which include provisions modeled after the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998. 

Today’s referral is the result of ongoing joint monitoring of the mobile app marketplace by CARU and the Accountability Program for compliance with their respective codes, work that both outfits have been conducting successfully for several years.

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge Eagle Family Foods Voluntarily Discontinues “America’s Most Trusted” Claim

New York, NY – December 10, 2024 – In a BBB National Programs’ National Advertising Division challenge brought by Nestlé, Eagle Family Foods Group voluntarily discontinued its advertising claim that Borden brand evaporated and sweetened condensed milks are “America’s Most Trusted.”

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Beyond Air Discontinue or Modify Comparative Safety Claims for its iNO Products

New York, NY – December 9, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended that Beyond Air discontinue or modify the challenged comparative superiority safety claims for its iNO (inhaled nitric oxide) products.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Teeth Whitening Claims for Oil Pulling Products be Discontinued; GuruNanda to Appeal

New York, NY – December 9, 2024 - The National Advertising Division recommended GuruNanda discontinue “natural teeth whitening” and “dazzle from first application” claims for its oil pulling and teeth whitening products. GuruNanda will appeal the "natural teeth whitening" claim decision.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

NAD Finds Certain Claims for Mott’s Fruit Flavored Snacks Supported or Outside NAD’s Jurisdiction; Recommends General Mills Discontinue or Modify Other Claims

New York, NY – November 25, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended that General Mills discontinue or modify certain express and implied claims regarding the fruit and vegetable content of Mott’s Fruit Flavored Snacks and the nutritional benefits of those ingredients.

Read the Decision Summary