LeapFrog Challenges Ad Claims for VTech’s InnoTab Computer Tablet

New York, NY – May 24, 2012 – The National Advertising Division has determined that because VTech North America LLC has made voluntary modifications to its InnoTab computer tablet, the message conveyed by advertising claims that promote the tablet’s capabilities is not misleading.  The InnoTab computer tablet is geared to children aged four years to nine years.

NAD is an investigative unit of the Advertising Self-Regulatory Council and administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus. The advertising at issue was challenged before NAD by LeapFrog, which markets a competing computer tablet for children called the LeapPad Explorer.

The challenger contended that VTech’s product packaging and advertising presented the overall impression that children could use the InnoTab, as sold, to perform a range of functions that include the ability to download games and other apps, watch movies, play music, and store and view photographs.

However, the challenger asserted, in order to access the full range of functions that VTech promotes, consumers must use a separately-purchased Secure Digital (SD) memory card, a material omission likely to mislead consumers.

The advertiser rejected LeapFrog’s contention that its marketing materials were deceptive because they do not disclose that an SD card is required in order to expand the memory of the InnoTab to access the additional content which the InnoTab is capable of running.  Further, the advertiser contended there was no implied claim that the product could  perform all of the functions depicted without additional memory, thus the absence of a disclosure does not constitute a material omission.

At the outset, NAD noted with approval that the advertiser voluntarily made available, through an online software update, 42 MB of InnoTab on-board memory for units previously sold, as well as redesigned the next generation InnoTab that will come with 42 MB of on-board memory immediately available.  NAD also appreciated that, during the course of the proceeding that the advertiser voluntarily agreed to modify its product packaging and advertising, including commercials and videos, to better disclose that “additional content may require an SD card (not included).”

Taking those changes into account, NAD then considered whether VTech’s advertising, regarding the various functionalities of the InnoTab, was truthful and accurate.
Following its review of the advertising at issue, NAD determined that the message conveyed was not misleading in light of the advertiser’s modifications to the InnoTab product. However, NAD noted, a disclosure would have been necessary had the advertiser not redesigned the product to make a sufficient amount of on-board memory immediately available for user downloads.

NAD noted in its decision that VTech advertising included a “free downloads” claim. NAD determined that in order to prevent consumer confusion regarding the fact that there is a limitation to this offer (based on the size of available memory), the advertiser must clearly and conspicuously disclose, in close proximity to the “free downloads” claim, that the purchase of additional memory may be needed.

After examining the advertiser’s proposed revised InnoTab packaging – which in several places discloses that “Additional content may require an SD memory card (not included) – NAD the font size of the disclosure on the inside front flap of the packaging be increased.

Further, NAD recommended that the disclosure on the back of the revised packaging should be made in close proximity to the “free downloads” claim and should be made sufficiently prominent, clear, and conspicuous to ensure that consumers will notice it.

InnoTab, in its advertiser’s statement, said that it respectfully disagrees “with NAD’s position with respect to the initial InnoTab product.”

The company said, however, that it would “be mindful of NAD’s advice regarding font size and placement for any future packaging run for the product.”

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Blueprint Test Preparation Discontinue Certain MCAT Score Improvement Claims

New York, NY – April 22, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended Blueprint Test Preparation discontinue certain express and implied claims made in connection with its four MCAT preparation courses, including claims that Blueprint students raise their MCAT scores by 15 or 13 points on average.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends The Princeton Review Discontinue Point Increase Claims for MCAT Test Preparation Services

New York, NY – April 18, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge, the National Advertising Division recommended that The Princeton Review (TPR) discontinue claims that its students “Score a 515+ on the MCAT or add 15 points depending on your starting score. Guaranteed or your money back.”

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Trades of Hope Discontinue Salesforce Member Earnings Claims

McLean, VA – April 17, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended that Trades of Hope discontinue certain earnings claims made by salesforce members on Facebook and YouTube. 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals Discontinue “100% Pure Avocado Oil” Claim for Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil

New York, NY – April 15, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended that Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals discontinue the claim “100% Pure Avocado Oil” for its Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil and avoid conveying the unsupported message that the product is 100% pure avocado...

Read the Decision Summary