Meal Delivery Service Gobble Says it will Discontinue ‘Eco-Friendly’ Advertising Claims for its Packaging
New York, NY – Nov. 18, 2015 – Gobble, Inc., a meal delivery service, has said that it will discontinue “eco-friendly” advertising claims made by the company for its product packaging following an inquiry by the National Advertising Division.
NAD is an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation. It is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus. As part of its ongoing monitoring, NAD requested substantiation for claims that appeared at the advertiser’s website, including:
- “Are the packaging materials eco-friendly? Yes! We’ve selected insulated liners that are biodegradable so that you can dispose of them in your trash with minimal impact on the environment.”
- “The boxes that we use to package your kits are also 100% eco-friendly and made entirely from previously recycled materials.”
- “Thank you for helping our efforts to build a sustainable and eco-friendly business.”
NAD noted in its decision that it was extremely concerned about the advertiser’s strong eco-friendly claims, as well as its unqualified biodegradability claims.
In response to NAD’s inquiry, the advertiser stated that, although it had a good faith belief that its claims were true when it made them, it is permanently discontinuing the claims at issue. The advertiser said that it has removed the claims from its website, and the claims are not being otherwise distributed by or on behalf of Gobble.
In reliance on the advertiser’s representation that the claims had been permanently discontinued, NAD did not review the claims on their merits. The voluntarily discontinued claims will be treated, for compliance purposes, as though NAD recommended their discontinuance and the advertiser agreed to comply.
Gobble, in its advertiser’s statement, said the company “appreciates NAD’s guidance on national standards for environmental claims and, notwithstanding Gobble’s good-faith belief in the accuracy of its claims, Gobble has withdrawn the claims as outlined by NAD.”
Note: A recommendation by NAD to modify or discontinue a claim is not a finding of wrongdoing and an advertiser’s voluntary discontinuance or modification of claims should not be construed as an admission of impropriety. It is the policy of NAD not to endorse any company, product, or service. Decisions finding that advertising claims have been substantiated should not be construed as endorsements.
Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.
Latest Decisions
Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Valentus Discontinue Earnings and Product Performance Claims
McLean, VA – December 23, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended Valentus, a direct selling company that sells nutritional and lifestyle products, discontinue earnings and health-related product performance claims made on social media and on the Valentus website.
Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Refers Olive Tree Earnings Claims to the FTC and California AG for Possible Enforcement Action
McLean, VA – December 20, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) referred Olive Tree to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and California Attorney General's Office for possible enforcement action after Olive Tree failed to respond to a DSSRC inquiry into earnings claims.
Children’s Advertising Review Unit Recommends JustPlay Discontinue or Modify Daisy the Yoga Goat Claims
New York, NY – December 19, 2024 - The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU) launched an investigation into advertising for Just Play’s furReal Daisy the Yoga Goat seeking to determine if the toy’s product packaging and commercial advertisements comply with CARU’s Self-Regulatory Guidelines for Children’s Advertising.
In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge, Oral Essentials Voluntarily Modifies “Made in USA” Claims
New York, NY – December 19, 2024 – In a National Advertising Division challenge, Oral Essentials agreed to permanently modify its claim that certain Oral Essentials oral healthcare products are “Made in USA.”