National Advertising Division Recommends Discontinuation or Modification of Certain Health Benefit Claims for Memory Health Dietary Supplement
New York, NY – August 28, 2023 – In a challenge brought by Vision Elements, Inc., the National Advertising Division (NAD) of BBB National Programs recommended that in connection with its Memory Health dietary supplement, Memory Health, LP discontinue:
- Certain claims that reasonably convey that the product is effective in treating symptoms associated with neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s and dementia.
- An unsupported claim that consumption of the product is a form of Alzheimer’s disease prevention.
- Two implied safety claims.
NAD also recommended Memory Health modify certain claims about its product patents, removing reference to the prevention and treatment of neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s and dementia.
Study Claims
Vision Elements challenged a number of health benefit claims, including clinically proven improvements in memory, mood, focus, clarity, cognitive function, and mental health in both diseased and healthy human brains. NAD noted that such claims require substantiation in the form of competent and reliable scientific evidence on the product as it is marketed to consumers.
NAD determined that Memory Health’s studies and reviews do not provide a reasonable basis for the health benefits message conveyed by the challenged claims. NAD further concluded that the studies’ results are not a good fit for the claims and that they overstate the scientific evidence on which they are based.
NAD also determined that the challenged claims convey a message to consumers that the Memory Health product is effective in treating symptoms associated with neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s and dementia, a message that is not supported.
For these reasons, NAD recommended that the challenged claims be discontinued.
Patent Claims
NAD examined whether certain claims referencing patents, such as Memory Health is “the first supplement to receive a patent for the prevention and treatment of neurodegenerative disease, specifically Alzheimer’s and dementia,” convey a misleading message.
NAD found that many consumers may reasonably interpret these patent claims to mean that Memory Health received a patent based on a federal agency’s determination of its effectiveness in treating and preventing neurodegenerative diseases—a message that is not supported.
Therefore, NAD recommended that Memory Health modify the claims to remove reference to the prevention and treatment of neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s and dementia, to avoid conveying a message that the Memory Health supplement has been approved by regulatory authorities (such as the FDA) as effective in treating and preventing neurodegenerative disease.
Strong Believers Claim
NAD found that, in context, consumers may reasonably understand the statement “At Memory Health we are strong believers in nutritional supplementation as a form of prevention, especially if Alzheimer’s Disease runs in your family” as a claim that Memory Health consumption is a form of Alzheimer’s disease prevention. In the absence of competent and reliable scientific evidence to support the claim, NAD recommended that it be discontinued.
Safety Claims
NAD recommended that Memory Health discontinue the claims “A safe, natural supplement” and “No side effects” because Memory Health did not provide adequate support.
During the proceeding, Memory Health agreed to permanently discontinue many other challenged claims. Therefore, NAD did not review these claims on the merits.
In its advertiser statement, Memory Health stated that it “believes that the challenged claims are thoroughly supported” by scientific studies and although it “strongly disagrees with the factual conclusions reached in the Final Decision, Memory Health respects the NAD’s decision and will comply with the NAD’s recommendations.”
All BBB National Programs case decision summaries can be found in the case decision library. For the full text of NAD, NARB, and CARU decisions, subscribe to the online archive. Per NAD procedures, this release shall not be used for advertising or promotional purposes.
Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.
Latest Decisions
Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Refers Olive Tree Earnings Claims to the FTC and California AG for Possible Enforcement Action
McLean, VA – December 20, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) referred Olive Tree to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and California Attorney General's Office for possible enforcement action after Olive Tree failed to respond to a DSSRC inquiry into earnings claims.
Children’s Advertising Review Unit Recommends JustPlay Discontinue or Modify Daisy the Yoga Goat Claims
New York, NY – December 19, 2024 - The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU) launched an investigation into advertising for Just Play’s furReal Daisy the Yoga Goat seeking to determine if the toy’s product packaging and commercial advertisements comply with CARU’s Self-Regulatory Guidelines for Children’s Advertising.
In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge, Oral Essentials Voluntarily Modifies “Made in USA” Claims
New York, NY – December 19, 2024 – In a National Advertising Division challenge, Oral Essentials agreed to permanently modify its claim that certain Oral Essentials oral healthcare products are “Made in USA.”
National Advertising Division Recommends Zuru Modify or Discontinue Certain Claims for its Rascals and Millie Moon Diapers
New York, NY – December 18, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended Zuru Edge Limited modify or discontinue certain claims for its Rascals and Millie Moon diaper products.