Moon Juice Discontinues Challenged Claims ‘MesoSilver Colloidal Silver Mineral Supplement’ Following NAD Inquiry
New York, NY – Oct. 7, 2015 – Moon Juice, the operator of the website www.moonjuiceshop.com, has said it will no longer make the express claims for “MesoSilver Colloidal Silver Mineral Supplement” that prompted an inquiry from the National Advertising Division.
NAD is an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation. It is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus.
As part of its routine monitoring of national advertising, NAD requested substantiation for claims for the product that appeared at moonjuiceshop.com. The following claims formed the basis of NAD’s inquiry:
- “With the highest bioavailability of any colloidal silver, MesoSilver’s small particle size and high particle concentration of nanoparticle silver combats fungus, viruses and harmful bacteria on contact.”
- “It helps the body to reach a deeper detoxification while strengthening the immune system.”
In response to NAD’s inquiry, the advertiser said that it no longer sells MesoSilver. Further, the advertiser noted that it purchased the MesoSilver product from a third-party manufacturer and the advertising claims which appeared on the Moon Juice website were taken directly from information supplied by this provider and other available sources. Finally, the advertiser stated that it will permanently discontinue the claims at issue in this proceeding.
In reliance on the advertiser’s representation that these claims have been permanently discontinued, NAD did not review these claims on their merits. The voluntarily discontinued claims will be treated, for compliance purposes, as though NAD recommended their discontinuance and the advertiser agreed to comply.
The company, in its advertiser’s statement, said that it “appreciates the opportunity to participate in this proceeding. Moon Juice supports NAD and encourages others in the advertising industry to participate in the self-regulatory process.”
Note: A recommendation by NAD to modify or discontinue a claim is not a finding of wrongdoing and an advertiser’s voluntary discontinuance or modification of claims should not be construed as an admission of impropriety. It is the policy of NAD not to endorse any company, product, or service. Decisions finding that advertising claims have been substantiated should not be construed as endorsements.
Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.
Latest Decisions
Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Valentus Discontinue Earnings and Product Performance Claims
McLean, VA – December 23, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended Valentus, a direct selling company that sells nutritional and lifestyle products, discontinue earnings and health-related product performance claims made on social media and on the Valentus website.
Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Refers Olive Tree Earnings Claims to the FTC and California AG for Possible Enforcement Action
McLean, VA – December 20, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) referred Olive Tree to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and California Attorney General's Office for possible enforcement action after Olive Tree failed to respond to a DSSRC inquiry into earnings claims.
Children’s Advertising Review Unit Recommends JustPlay Discontinue or Modify Daisy the Yoga Goat Claims
New York, NY – December 19, 2024 - The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU) launched an investigation into advertising for Just Play’s furReal Daisy the Yoga Goat seeking to determine if the toy’s product packaging and commercial advertisements comply with CARU’s Self-Regulatory Guidelines for Children’s Advertising.
In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge, Oral Essentials Voluntarily Modifies “Made in USA” Claims
New York, NY – December 19, 2024 – In a National Advertising Division challenge, Oral Essentials agreed to permanently modify its claim that certain Oral Essentials oral healthcare products are “Made in USA.”