NAD Finds Dole Commercial Doesn’t Disparage Competing ‘Fruit Bowl’ Products; Recommends Advertiser Modify or Discontinue Line Claim

New York, NY – Aug. 4, 2015  – The National Advertising Division has determined that a commercial for “Dole Fruit Bowls,” a product of Dole Packaged Foods, LLC, doesn’t disparage competing products. NAD has also recommended that Dole either discontinue the implied claim that all of its “Dole Fruit Bowl” products are packed in 100 percent fruit juice, or modify the claim to clearly identify which products are packed in juice and which are packed in light syrup. Advertising claims made by Dole were challenged by Del Monte Foods, Inc.

NAD is an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation. It is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus.

At issue in this case was a revised television commercial, set in a gym, that featured two women with packaged fruit cups.

In the revised commercial, one woman drained the liquid from the fruit cup and explained that “Mine’s in syrup so I like to drain it.”  The second woman noted that her Dole fruit bowl was packed in “100% fruit juice.”

“So you don’t drain it?” the first woman asked.

“I drink it,” the second woman responded.

The commercial closed with a voiceover that stated: “Dole Fruit Bowls, the only national brand packed in 100% real fruit juice,” accompanied by a super at the bottom of the screen that read “Dole’s entire line of regular Fruit Bowls are packed in 100% fruit juice.  National competitors primarily pack regular fruit cups in syrup.”

In response to NAD’s initial inquiry, Dole noted that it had revised its broadcast advertising to remove earlier references to “goo” and “sugary syrup” – as well as any potentially implied comparative sugar content or comparative viscosity claims regarding the parties’ respective packing medium – before receiving NAD’s request for substantiation.

Del Monte noted that it appreciated the revisions, but argued that the advertiser continued to falsely imply that the packing medium in Del Monte’s fruit cups was not suitable for consumption and that consumers who are concerned about their health should avoid consuming it.

Following its review, NAD determined that the advertisement did not convey a falsely disparaging message but, rather conveyed the truthful message about the differences in the packing medium of certain fruit cups. However, NAD also determined that the commercial conveyed a line claim that was not substantiated.

While the super stated that “Dole’s entire line of regular Fruit Bowls is packed in 100% fruit juice,” neither the commercial nor the super made clear to consumers what Dole’s “regular” Fruit Bowl is.  Dole’s website does not include a “regular” fruit bowl product among its fruit bowl products, NAD noted. Instead, the “100% Juice” products depicted on the website are referred to as Dole’s “standard” Fruit Bowls.

NAD determined that a reasonable consumer was likely to take away the unsupported message that the “100% juice” claim applied to all Dole Fruit Bowl products.  As such, NAD recommended that the advertiser: (1) either discontinue or sufficiently modify its packed in 100% fruit juice claim to more narrowly tailor it to refer solely to a select subset of its Fruit Bowl products that actually contain 100% fruit juice, and (2) take steps to ensure the description of the subset of Dole Fruit Bowls packed in 100% fruit juice is consistent across different media.

Dole took issue with certain of NAD’s findings, but said that “out of respect for the self-regulatory process, Dole accepts the decision, and will take it into account in future advertising for these products.”

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Valentus Discontinue Earnings and Product Performance Claims

McLean, VA – December 23, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended Valentus, a direct selling company that sells nutritional and lifestyle products, discontinue earnings and health-related product performance claims made on social media and on the Valentus website.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Refers Olive Tree Earnings Claims to the FTC and California AG for Possible Enforcement Action

McLean, VA – December 20, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) referred Olive Tree to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and California Attorney General's Office for possible enforcement action after Olive Tree failed to respond to a DSSRC inquiry into earnings claims.  

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Children’s Advertising Review Unit Recommends JustPlay Discontinue or Modify Daisy the Yoga Goat Claims

New York, NY – December 19, 2024 - The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU) launched an investigation into advertising for Just Play’s furReal Daisy the Yoga Goat seeking to determine if the toy’s product packaging and commercial advertisements comply with CARU’s Self-Regulatory Guidelines for Children’s Advertising.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge, Oral Essentials Voluntarily Modifies “Made in USA” Claims

New York, NY – December 19, 2024 – In a National Advertising Division challenge, Oral Essentials agreed to permanently modify its claim that certain Oral Essentials oral healthcare products are “Made in USA.” 

Read the Decision Summary