NAD Finds Energizer Can Support Certain Claims for ‘EcoAdvanced’ Recycled Batteries; Recommends More Prominent Disclosure of Recycled Content

New York, NY – Nov. 4, 2015 – The National Advertising Division has determined that Energizer Holdings, Inc., can support certain advertising claims for the company’s EcoAdvanced recycled batteries.

NAD recommended, however, that the advertiser more prominently disclose the recycled content of the product by weight when making claims that promote EcoAdvanced products as “recycled” or “made with recycled batteries.”

NAD is an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation. It is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus.

As part of its ongoing monitoring efforts, NAD requested substantiation for advertising claims that included:

  • “It’s our biggest breakthrough yet. We’re taking worn out batteries and making them into something strong.  New Energizer EcoAdvanced.  The world’s first long-lasting battery made with recycled batteries. That’s positive energy.” 
  • “Contain 4% recycled batteries for less impact on the environment.”
  • “EcoAdvanced is our longest-lasting alkaline battery and the world’s first AA battery made with recycled batteries. Today, it contains 4% by total weight (which is nearly 10% of a key active ingredient).  It’s another step in our journey to bring performance and responsibility to the world.  That’s positive energy!”
  • “Now enjoy performance for your most critical devices, while creating less impact on the planet. Energizer EcoAdvanced creates less impact on the planet by requiring less mining of virgin material and reducing the amount of batteries consumers need to power their devices resulting in less waste.”

NAD also considered whether the claims implied that EcoAdvanced batteries provide significant environmental benefits or are more environmentally beneficial overall than other batteries.

Following its review of the evidence in the record, including proprietary information provided on a confidential basis, NAD determined that the totality of evidence provided a reasonable basis for Energizer’s claims that its EcoAdvanced batteries produce less impact on the environment including, for example, that EcoAdvanced contain 4% recycled batteries “for less impact on the environment.”

NAD further determined that Energizer provided a reasonable basis for its expressly quantified claims that EcoAdvanced batteries are made with 4% recycled batteries (by weight).

With regard to Energizer’s claim that EcoAdvanced batteries are “The world’s first long-lasting battery made with recycled batteries,” NAD recommended that wherever the claim appears it should always be qualified by the recycled content amount of 4% either in the main claim itself or by a disclosure in immediate proximity to the triggering claim and in a font size and color that are easy to notice, read and understand.

NAD recommended that the advertiser, in print advertising and product packaging inserts, include the qualifying language in immediate proximity to the triggering claim (“EcoAdvanced “Isn’t 100% New”) and in a way that is as easy to notice, read and understand as the main claim.

The company, in its advertiser’s statement, said that “out of deference to NAD and respect for the self-regulatory process, Energizer will modify those certain advertising executions to address NAD’s concerns. Energizer appreciates NAD’s close attention to the record in this matter.”

Note: A recommendation by NAD to modify or discontinue a claim is not a finding of wrongdoing and an advertiser’s voluntary discontinuance or modification of claims should not be construed as an admission of impropriety. It is the policy of NAD not to endorse any company, product, or service. Decisions finding that advertising claims have been substantiated should not be construed as endorsements.

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Valentus Discontinue Earnings and Product Performance Claims

McLean, VA – December 23, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended Valentus, a direct selling company that sells nutritional and lifestyle products, discontinue earnings and health-related product performance claims made on social media and on the Valentus website.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Refers Olive Tree Earnings Claims to the FTC and California AG for Possible Enforcement Action

McLean, VA – December 20, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) referred Olive Tree to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and California Attorney General's Office for possible enforcement action after Olive Tree failed to respond to a DSSRC inquiry into earnings claims.  

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Children’s Advertising Review Unit Recommends JustPlay Discontinue or Modify Daisy the Yoga Goat Claims

New York, NY – December 19, 2024 - The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU) launched an investigation into advertising for Just Play’s furReal Daisy the Yoga Goat seeking to determine if the toy’s product packaging and commercial advertisements comply with CARU’s Self-Regulatory Guidelines for Children’s Advertising.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge, Oral Essentials Voluntarily Modifies “Made in USA” Claims

New York, NY – December 19, 2024 – In a National Advertising Division challenge, Oral Essentials agreed to permanently modify its claim that certain Oral Essentials oral healthcare products are “Made in USA.” 

Read the Decision Summary