NAD Finds STIHL Can Support ‘Built in America’ Claim, Recommends More Prominent Disclaimer

New York, NY – Oct. 22, 2013 – The National Advertising Division has determined that STIHL Incorporated can support a “Built in America” advertising claim featured in national advertising, but recommended the company make an accompanying disclosure more prominent.

NAD is an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation. It is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus.

In response to a consumer inquiry, NAD requested the company provide substantiation the following express claim, made in a print advertisement in USA Today:

“All These, Built in America*”
“*A majority of STIHL Products are built in the United States from domestic and foreign components.”

NAD also considered whether the language implied that all parts and materials used in the manufacture of STIHL products are made in the United States and all products are assembled in the United States.

NAD noted in its decision that the Federal Trade Commission has provided very clear guidance for advertisers seeking to claim that their products are made in the United States. That standard requires that products promoted – without qualification – as “Made in the U.S.A.” must be “all or virtually all” made in the United States, meaning that the product should have no or negligible foreign content.

In this case, NAD noted, the accompanying disclaimer – “A majority of STIHL products are built in the United States from domestic and foreign components” – plainly stated that products depicted in the advertisements were fully assembled in the United States from foreign and domestic parts. NAD determined that a reasonable consumer, having read the disclosure, would be unlikely to take away the message that the products were made entirely of American-sourced components.

However, NAD noted, the disclaimer at issue was printed in “mice type” – very small type – at the bottom of a full-age newspaper advertisement. The disclaimer, NAD found, was difficult to read, difficult to find and not in close proximity to the main claim.

NAD recommended the advertiser modify its claim to make the disclaiming language clear and conspicuous by making it substantially larger and placing it in close proximity to the triggering claim, “Built in America.”

STIHL, in its advertiser’s statements, said the company “accepts the NAD’s decision, will review future advertising in light of its recommendations, and agrees to make its “Built in America” qualification more conspicuous going forward.”

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Oral Essentials Discontinue "Certified Non-Toxic" Claim for its Lumineux Mouthwash

New York, NY – December 30, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by GuruNanda, the National Advertising Division recommended that Oral Essentials discontinue its claim that Lumineux mouthwash products are “Certified Non-Toxic.” 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

NARB Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify Commercial to Better Disclose Conditions of Free iPhone Offer, 20% Savings Claim

New York, NY – December 30, 2024 – A panel of the National Advertising Review Board (NARB) recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its commercial to better disclose the material conditions of its free iPhone 16 Pro offer and its 20% rate plan savings claim compared to AT&T and Verizon. 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Valentus Discontinue Earnings and Product Performance Claims

McLean, VA – December 23, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended Valentus, a direct selling company that sells nutritional and lifestyle products, discontinue earnings and health-related product performance claims made on social media and on the Valentus website.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Refers Olive Tree Earnings Claims to the FTC and California AG for Possible Enforcement Action

McLean, VA – December 20, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) referred Olive Tree to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and California Attorney General's Office for possible enforcement action after Olive Tree failed to respond to a DSSRC inquiry into earnings claims.  

Read the Decision Summary