NAD Recommends Capital One Discontinue Certain Claims for Spark Cards; Company to Appeals NAD’s Findings

New York, NY – Nov. 13, 2012  – The National Advertising Division has recommended that Capital One Bank (USA), N.A., discontinue print, broadcast, and website advertising challenged by Chase Bank USA, N.A. Capital One said it will appeal NAD’s decision  to the National Advertising Review Board.

NAD is an investigative unit of the advertising industry system of self-regulation. It is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus.

In this case, NAD considered how consumers would interpret the advertiser’s claims that its small-business Spark cards offer the “most rewards,” the “most cash,” or the “most miles.”
Following its review of the evidence in the record, NAD determined that consumers could  take away the message that typical Spark cardholders would earn more “rewards,” “cash,” and “miles,” than typical consumers who have competing cards.

NAD noted in its decision that an advertiser making such a claim “need not show that each and every consumer would earn the ‘most rewards,’ whether cash or miles, compared to each and every holder of a competing card. Rather, the advertiser needed to substantiate the claim as to the ‘typical’ cardholder.”
In a previous case, NAD had noted that it is “exceptionally difficult” to substantiate “overall superiority claims in this particular product category.”

In this case, Capital One provided NAD with research that purportedly addressed the spending habits of typical small-business consumers. The advertiser argued that its evidence demonstrated the amount that card holders’ spend in various categories and in total, and the amount of rewards that these typical spenders would receive using its Spark cards compared to competing programs.
While NAD noted that it appreciated the multiple kinds of evidence provided by Capital One, it had certain concerns about the evidence.

In reviewing Capital One’s own internal spending data, NAD questioned whether the advertiser was justified in extrapolating spending patterns from its own cardholders to cardholders throughout the large, diverse, and ever-changing marketplace of small business credit cards. Although the advertiser argued that its own array of business rewards credit cards are representative of the marketplace as a whole, NAD was not persuaded that the evidence in the record supported that assertion.

NAD also reviewed benchmark data provided by a data-collecting organization that serves the financial services industry. The organization does not release information about which small-business cards and card issuers are surveyed.
“Given the absence of data showing which cards and issuers were included in the survey, NAD declined to unquestioningly accept the data as broadly representative of the marketplace. In sum, NAD concluded that the benchmarking data provided some additional evidence of consumers’ spending habits – but failed (on its own, or in conjunction with Capital One’s internal data) to satisfy the ‘exceptionally difficult’ task of substantiating superiority claims as between competing rewards credit cards.

Finally, NAD determined that a survey commissioned by the advertiser to produce a representative record of credit card spending among a nationally representative sample of small businesses was not sufficiently reliable for the purposes of claim support.

NAD was troubled by the internal inconsistency of the survey results. Further, NAD noted, “in light of the fact that approximately half of the respondents acknowledged that they did not consult their financial records when answering the questions, NAD determined that the likelihood of error was significant.”
Viewing the evidence cumulatively, NAD determined that Capital One’s evidence was insufficient to support its unqualified “most rewards,” “most miles,” and “most cash back” claims, and recommended that these claims be discontinued.

Capital One, in its advertiser’s statement, took issue with NAD’s decision and will appeal NAD’s findings to the National Advertising Review Board (NARB).

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Blueprint Test Preparation Discontinue Certain MCAT Score Improvement Claims

New York, NY – April 22, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended Blueprint Test Preparation discontinue certain express and implied claims made in connection with its four MCAT preparation courses, including claims that Blueprint students raise their MCAT scores by 15 or 13 points on average.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends The Princeton Review Discontinue Point Increase Claims for MCAT Test Preparation Services

New York, NY – April 18, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge, the National Advertising Division recommended that The Princeton Review (TPR) discontinue claims that its students “Score a 515+ on the MCAT or add 15 points depending on your starting score. Guaranteed or your money back.”

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Trades of Hope Discontinue Salesforce Member Earnings Claims

McLean, VA – April 17, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended that Trades of Hope discontinue certain earnings claims made by salesforce members on Facebook and YouTube. 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals Discontinue “100% Pure Avocado Oil” Claim for Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil

New York, NY – April 15, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended that Lily of the Desert Nutraceuticals discontinue the claim “100% Pure Avocado Oil” for its Tropical Plantation Avocado Oil and avoid conveying the unsupported message that the product is 100% pure avocado...

Read the Decision Summary