NAD Refers Advertising for Verizon FiOS to FTC, FCC for Further Review After Advertiser Declines to Respond to Comcast Challenge

New York, NY – June 20, 2017  – The National Advertising Division has referred advertising claims made by Verizon Communications, Inc., to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Federal Communications Commission (FCC) for further review, after the company declined to participate in a proceeding before NAD.

NAD is an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation. It is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus.

Comcast Cable Communications challenged claims made by Verizon for its internet speeds, including:

  • “Fastest Internet Available”
  • “Fastest Most Reliable Internet Available”
  • “Only FiOS has the Fastest Internet Available”
  • “FiOS is the fastest internet available with speeds up to 500Mbps”
  • “Only FiOS gives you equal upload and download speeds.”
  • “Instant Internet”
  • “Most People Don’t Have 50Mbps of speed.  Instant Internet is 750 Mbps.

The Competition Doesn’t Even Come Close.”

  • “PC Magazine’s #1 For Internet Speed 10 Years Running.”
  • “FiOS.  The Fastest Most Reliable Internet Available”
  • “Get 100% Out of All Your Devices”
  • “Fastest WiFi Available”
  • “We are a 100% Fiber Optic Network which means the fastest Internet
    and WiFi Available.”

Given the advertiser’s decision against participation in the self-regulatory process, NAD has referred the advertising at issue to the FTC for review, pursuant to NAD/CARU Procedures.

Note: A recommendation by NAD to modify or discontinue a claim is not a finding of wrongdoing and an advertiser’s voluntary discontinuance or modification of claims should not be construed as an admission of impropriety. It is the policy of NAD not to endorse any company, product, or service. Decisions finding that advertising claims have been substantiated should not be construed as endorsements.

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Lemongrass Discontinue Certain Earnings and Health-Related Product Claims

McLean, VA – May 6, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended that Lemongrass Spa Products modify or discontinue certain earnings and health-related product performance claims. 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Blueprint Test Preparation Discontinue Certain MCAT Score Improvement Claims

New York, NY – April 22, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended Blueprint Test Preparation discontinue certain express and implied claims made in connection with its four MCAT preparation courses, including claims that Blueprint students raise their MCAT scores by 15 or 13 points on average.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends The Princeton Review Discontinue Point Increase Claims for MCAT Test Preparation Services

New York, NY – April 18, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge, the National Advertising Division recommended that The Princeton Review (TPR) discontinue claims that its students “Score a 515+ on the MCAT or add 15 points depending on your starting score. Guaranteed or your money back.”

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Trades of Hope Discontinue Salesforce Member Earnings Claims

McLean, VA – April 17, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended that Trades of Hope discontinue certain earnings claims made by salesforce members on Facebook and YouTube. 

Read the Decision Summary