NAD Refers Advertising for Verizon FiOS to FTC, FCC for Further Review After Advertiser Declines to Respond to Comcast Challenge

New York, NY – June 20, 2017  – The National Advertising Division has referred advertising claims made by Verizon Communications, Inc., to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Federal Communications Commission (FCC) for further review, after the company declined to participate in a proceeding before NAD.

NAD is an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation. It is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus.

Comcast Cable Communications challenged claims made by Verizon for its internet speeds, including:

  • “Fastest Internet Available”
  • “Fastest Most Reliable Internet Available”
  • “Only FiOS has the Fastest Internet Available”
  • “FiOS is the fastest internet available with speeds up to 500Mbps”
  • “Only FiOS gives you equal upload and download speeds.”
  • “Instant Internet”
  • “Most People Don’t Have 50Mbps of speed.  Instant Internet is 750 Mbps.

The Competition Doesn’t Even Come Close.”

  • “PC Magazine’s #1 For Internet Speed 10 Years Running.”
  • “FiOS.  The Fastest Most Reliable Internet Available”
  • “Get 100% Out of All Your Devices”
  • “Fastest WiFi Available”
  • “We are a 100% Fiber Optic Network which means the fastest Internet
    and WiFi Available.”

Given the advertiser’s decision against participation in the self-regulatory process, NAD has referred the advertising at issue to the FTC for review, pursuant to NAD/CARU Procedures.

Note: A recommendation by NAD to modify or discontinue a claim is not a finding of wrongdoing and an advertiser’s voluntary discontinuance or modification of claims should not be construed as an admission of impropriety. It is the policy of NAD not to endorse any company, product, or service. Decisions finding that advertising claims have been substantiated should not be construed as endorsements.

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Dr. Luke Healthcare Discontinue Treatment Claims for its Fungal Nail Renewal Product

New York, NY – July 24, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended Dr. Luke Healthcare discontinue certain claims for Dr. Luke’s Fungal Nail Renewal product, including health-related claims, natural claims, and claims that a doctor recommends the product or that it treats a medical condition.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Finds Flag Image on Kendamil Infant Formula Packaging Conveys Supported Message about Products’ Origin

New York, NY – July 17, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge, the National Advertising Division determined that use of a flag image on product packaging for Kendal Nutricare’s Kendamil infant formula reasonably conveys a supported message about the products’ origin. 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

In National Advertising Division Case, GuruNanda Voluntarily Discontinues Claims Made through Influencers for Coconut Pulling Oil Products

New York, NY – July 16, 2024 – The National Advertising Division has closed a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge regarding claims that GuruNanda’s coconut pulling oil products can “naturally reverse a cavity” and “reverse cavities.” 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Refers Health-Related Advertising Claims for Prolacta’s Human Milk Fortifier to Regulatory Agencies

New York, NY – July 15, 2024 – The National Advertising Division will refer advertising claims made by Prolacta Bioscience for its Human Milk Fortifier to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for review.

Read the Decision Summary