National Advertising Review Board Recommends American Beverage Association Modify Certain Environmental Benefit Claims for “Every Bottle Back” Initiative

New York, NY – March 16, 2023 – A panel of the National Advertising Review Board (NARB), the appellate advertising law body of BBB National Programs, recommended that the American Beverage Association (ABA) modify certain aspirational claims regarding the use of recycled materials in bottles, as well as claims relating to ABA’s partnerships with non-profit organizations and efforts to achieve sustainability goals. 

ABA is the trade association for the U.S. nonalcoholic beverage industry whose members are The Coca-Cola Company, Keurig Dr Pepper, and PepsiCo. 

The advertising at issue, which appeared in a video run on national cable channels and on the advertiser’s website, had been challenged by the National Advertising Division (NAD) as part of its independent routine monitoring of truth and transparency in U.S. national advertising. Following NAD’s decision (Case No. 7011), ABA appealed NAD’s findings and recommendations that it modify specific claims in its video and website.

In the underlying decision, NAD determined that ABA “provided a reasonable basis” for several environmental benefit claims related to its Every Bottle Back program. But NAD recommended that ABA modify several claims that NAD determined overstate the extent to which plastic bottles currently sold by ABA members are made from recycled plastic resulting in a reduction in plastic waste, and the results of its partnership with several organizations regarding reducing plastic waste. 

In agreement with NAD, the NARB panel concluded that the following statements convey unsupported claims to consumers:

  • “They’re collected and separated from other plastics so they can be turned back into material that we use to make new bottles.”
  • “That . . . and reduces plastic waste.”
  • “Working with World Wildlife Fund through their ReSource: Plastic to reduce our plastic footprint.”
  • “Partnering with The Recycling Partnership and Closed Loop Partners to . . . modernize the recycling infrastructure in communities across the country.”

 

Recyclability Claims

The NARB panel found that the following claims convey to reasonable consumers that a significant amount of recycled content is currently used by the industry to produce new single use plastic bottles and that there is a resulting reduction in plastic waste today:

  • “They’re collected and separated from other plastics so they can be turned back into material that we use to make new bottles.”
  • “reduces plastic waste.”

 

The NARB panel noted that while ABA may have intended simply to explain the potential for bottles to be recycled, the ad went beyond that, conflating current recycling practices and outcomes with aspirational practices and outcomes. Therefore, the NARB panel recommended that the advertiser modify the video claims to further clarify that these statements relate to aspirational goals. 

Further, the NARB panel stated that the claims should not convey that there is current significant use of recycled bottles by industry to produce new bottles or any current significant reduction in plastic if that is not the case.

 

Claims About the ABA’s Partnerships

The NARB panel found that ABA members are actively participating with third-party partners in their recycling efforts, but that the following claims overstate the actual work being done:

  • “Working with World Wildlife Fund through their ReSource: Plastic to reduce our plastic footprint.”
  • “Partnering with The Recycling Partnership and Closed Loop Partners to . . . modernize the recycling infrastructure in communities across the country.”

 

Therefore, the NARB panel cautioned ABA to ensure that claims made in regard to the partnerships reflect what the partners are currently doing, and clearly convey future plans if that is the purpose of the message. 

The NARB panel lauded the industry’s goals and stated that NARB’s assessment of the claims and evidence does not prevent the advertiser from making future supported claims as its goals are attained or that contain effective calls to consumer action.

ABA said that it “appreciates NAD’s conclusions that many of our claims are substantiated, including that our member companies are designing 100% recyclable plastic bottles and are increasing awareness of that fact.” And while ABA “disagrees with NARB’s conclusions related to our partnerships and the recycling process” it “will comply with the NARB Decision and explore how best to modify.”

All BBB National Programs case decision summaries can be found in the case decision library. For the full text of NAD, NARB, and CARU decisions, subscribe to the online archive.

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Refers Olive Tree Earnings Claims to the FTC and California AG for Possible Enforcement Action

McLean, VA – December 20, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) referred Olive Tree to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and California Attorney General's Office for possible enforcement action after Olive Tree failed to respond to a DSSRC inquiry into earnings claims.  

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Children’s Advertising Review Unit Recommends JustPlay Discontinue or Modify Daisy the Yoga Goat Claims

New York, NY – December 19, 2024 - The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU) launched an investigation into advertising for Just Play’s furReal Daisy the Yoga Goat seeking to determine if the toy’s product packaging and commercial advertisements comply with CARU’s Self-Regulatory Guidelines for Children’s Advertising.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge, Oral Essentials Voluntarily Modifies “Made in USA” Claims

New York, NY – December 19, 2024 – In a National Advertising Division challenge, Oral Essentials agreed to permanently modify its claim that certain Oral Essentials oral healthcare products are “Made in USA.” 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Zuru Modify or Discontinue Certain Claims for its Rascals and Millie Moon Diapers

New York, NY – December 18, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended Zuru Edge Limited modify or discontinue certain claims for its Rascals and Millie Moon diaper products.

Read the Decision Summary