NARB Recommends Kimberly-Clark Discontinue Certain Claims Made for Huggies Following P&G Challenge
New York, NY – Feb. 6, 2019 – A panel of the National Advertising Review Board (NARB) has recommended that Kimberly-Clark discontinue its “fastest growing brand in hospitals” claim unless that claim is supported by recent data that includes Kimberly-Clark’s sales data in addition to reliable third-party sales or market share data for the hospital diaper market as a whole. The panel also recommended that any such claim be qualified to exclude smaller competitors that have grown at a faster rate (e.g., the “fastest growing brand” claim could indicate that it is being made against leading brands).
NARB is the appellate unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation. It is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus.
The advertising at issue was challenged by The Procter & Gamble Company before the National Advertising Division (NAD), an investigative unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation.
NAD recommended that the advertiser discontinue its claim that “Huggies® diapers is the fastest growing brand in hospitals (‘based on volume share growth.’)”
Kimberly-Clark appealed the NAD’s recommendation to NARB.
Kimberly-Clark’s support for its “fastest growing brand in hospitals” claim relied on a zero-sum analysis of the hospital diaper market between the second quarter of 2016 and the second quarter of 2017; it argued that due to declining birth rates and consistent procurement/use of diapers by hospitals, combined with the fact that Kimberly-Clark and Procter & Gamble accounted for 99.5% of the hospital diaper market, any increase in Kimberly-Clark’s diaper sales to hospitals necessarily resulted in a decrease in Procter & Gamble’s sales and thus an increase in Kimberly-Clark’s market share. Procter & Gamble disagreed with this analysis, arguing that the hospital diaper market was not fixed and Procter & Gamble’s sales in this market increased during the relevant time period.
The panel agreed with the NAD that support for a comparative “fastest growing brand” claim should include reliable sales or market share data for the market as a whole as collected and reported by a reliable third party. The panel further agreed with the NAD that the assumptions made by Kimberly-Clark with respect to the hospital diaper market were not sufficiently reliable to provide a reasonable basis for the claim made – there was insufficient evidence in the record that hospitals and hospital networks uniformly operate in a consistent manner in procuring diapers and/or providing diapers to hospital patients.
The panel noted that during the NAD proceeding Procter & Gamble supplied sales data that, in conjunction with Kimberly-Clark’s sales data, provided virtually complete sales data for the hospital diaper market between the second quarter of 2016 and the second quarter of 2017. When combined, the data from Procter & Gamble and Kimberly-Clark established that
Kimberly-Clark’s diaper sales to hospitals grew faster than Procter & Gamble’s during that time period. However, the panel found this data was too old to support a current “fastest growing brand in hospitals” claim, and that such a claim would need to be substantiated with more recent internal sales data in addition to reliable third-party sales or market share data for the hospital diaper market as a whole.
The panel recommended that Kimberly-Clark discontinue its “fastest growing brand in hospitals” claim unless that claim is supported by recent data that includes Kimberly-Clark’s sales data in addition to reliable third-party sales or market share data for the hospital diaper market as a whole. The panel also recommended that any such claim be qualified to exclude smaller competitors that have grown at a faster rate (e.g., the “fastest growing brand” claim could indicate that it is being made against leading brands).
Kimberly-Clark, in its advertiser’s statement, thanked the Panel and agreed to comply with the Panel’s recommendations in future advertising. “While NARB found that this [sales] data is too old to support a current “Fastest Growing Brand in Hospitals” claim, K-C is gratified that NARB found that the claim was supported, with possible qualification as to smaller competitors, during the pendency of the NAD challenge,” Kimberly-Clark said.
Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.
Latest Decisions
Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Refers Olive Tree Earnings Claims to the FTC and California AG for Possible Enforcement Action
McLean, VA – December 20, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) referred Olive Tree to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and California Attorney General's Office for possible enforcement action after Olive Tree failed to respond to a DSSRC inquiry into earnings claims.
Children’s Advertising Review Unit Recommends JustPlay Discontinue or Modify Daisy the Yoga Goat Claims
New York, NY – December 19, 2024 - The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU) launched an investigation into advertising for Just Play’s furReal Daisy the Yoga Goat seeking to determine if the toy’s product packaging and commercial advertisements comply with CARU’s Self-Regulatory Guidelines for Children’s Advertising.
In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge, Oral Essentials Voluntarily Modifies “Made in USA” Claims
New York, NY – December 19, 2024 – In a National Advertising Division challenge, Oral Essentials agreed to permanently modify its claim that certain Oral Essentials oral healthcare products are “Made in USA.”
National Advertising Division Recommends Zuru Modify or Discontinue Certain Claims for its Rascals and Millie Moon Diapers
New York, NY – December 18, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended Zuru Edge Limited modify or discontinue certain claims for its Rascals and Millie Moon diaper products.