National Advertising Division Finds Certain Claims for Old Trapper Beef Jerky are Puffery, Recommends Superiority Claims be Modified or Discontinued

New York, NY – January 8, 2024 – In a challenge brought by competitor Link Snacks, Inc., BBB National Programs’ National Advertising Division determined that in context “The Best” and “Clearly the Best” claims made by Old Trapper Smoked Products, Inc. for its Old Trapper Smoked Beef Jerky are puffery and not objective assertions of fact that Old Trapper jerky is “the best.” 

However, the National Advertising Division (NAD) recommended that Old Trapper discontinue the challenged ingredient claims to avoid conveying the message that they are using superior ingredients.

 

“The Best” and “Clearly the Best” Claims

NAD determined that the following claims were puffery:

  • Clearly the Best Beef Jerky. 
  • The Best Ingredients Create the Best Beef Jerky.
  • Old Trapper is Clearly the Best Beef Jerky. Clearly More. Clearly Nothing to Hide. Clearly Fresh. Clearly the Best.

 

NAD noted that:

  • Old Trapper’s “Clearly the Best Beef Jerky” slogan, when used on its product packaging and website, conveys a message of corporate pride, and the use of “best” is not comparative as no specific competitor or ingredient is identified. In these contexts, the challenged claims are unquantifiable and therefore, puffery. 
  • The claim “The Best Ingredients Create the Best Beef Jerky” which appears prominently on the Old Trapper website landing page, did not convey a specific comparative superiority message.
  • Old Trapper’s 15-second YouTube video that depicted a single bag of Old Trapper jerky while “Old Trapper is Clearly the Best Beef Jerky. Clearly More. Clearly Nothing to Hide. Clearly Fresh. Clearly the Best”, did not convey a comparative superiority message because the video only featured Old Trapper, did not tout attributes other than a single reference to “clearly fresh,” and did not refer to or depict any competitors or competitors’ products.

 

Ingredient Claims

Regarding the claim made on Old Trapper’s social media account, “We use only the highest quality ingredients in every Old Trapper flavor. That’s just one of the reasons why Old Trapper is #ClearlyTheBest,” NAD determined that the language “We use only the highest quality ingredients” is an objective claim that requires support. 

In the absence of any support that Old Trapper uses the highest quality ingredients, NAD recommended that Old Trapper discontinue or modify these claims to avoid conveying the message that they are using superior ingredients.

In its advertiser statement, Old Trapper stated that it “agrees to comply with NAD’s recommendations in this matter” and “appreciates NAD’s careful consideration of the issues presented.”

All BBB National Programs case decision summaries can be found in the case decision library. For the full text of NAD, NARB, and CARU decisions, subscribe to the online archive. Per NAD/NARB procedures, this release shall not be used for advertising or promotional purposes.

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Dr. Luke Healthcare Discontinue Treatment Claims for its Fungal Nail Renewal Product

New York, NY – July 24, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended Dr. Luke Healthcare discontinue certain claims for Dr. Luke’s Fungal Nail Renewal product, including health-related claims, natural claims, and claims that a doctor recommends the product or that it treats a medical condition.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Finds Flag Image on Kendamil Infant Formula Packaging Conveys Supported Message about Products’ Origin

New York, NY – July 17, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge, the National Advertising Division determined that use of a flag image on product packaging for Kendal Nutricare’s Kendamil infant formula reasonably conveys a supported message about the products’ origin. 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

In National Advertising Division Case, GuruNanda Voluntarily Discontinues Claims Made through Influencers for Coconut Pulling Oil Products

New York, NY – July 16, 2024 – The National Advertising Division has closed a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge regarding claims that GuruNanda’s coconut pulling oil products can “naturally reverse a cavity” and “reverse cavities.” 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Refers Health-Related Advertising Claims for Prolacta’s Human Milk Fortifier to Regulatory Agencies

New York, NY – July 15, 2024 – The National Advertising Division will refer advertising claims made by Prolacta Bioscience for its Human Milk Fortifier to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for review.

Read the Decision Summary