NAD Finds Certain Carbohydrate Claims for Olé Mexican Foods Tortillas Supported; Recommends Discontinuation of Other Claims

New York, NY – July 24, 2023 – The National Advertising Division (NAD) of BBB National Programs determined that Olé Mexican Foods, Inc. provided a reasonable basis for total carbohydrate amounts, some net carbohydrate amounts, and carb-effective calculations advertised on its product packaging and website for its La Banderita and Xtreme Wellness tortillas. 

However, NAD recommended that Olé discontinue:

  • Any claims that its products have “0 net carbs per serving,” are “keto net zero” and any effective carb count calculations that indicate 0 net carbohydrates per serving for any products that have more than .5 grams of net carbs; and     
  • The “Carb Lean” claim found on the product labeling and website for the La Banderita Carb Counter product and certain Xtreme Wellness products.

 

The claims at issue were challenged by Gruma Corporation. Both Gruma and Olé manufacture and sell “low” or “no” net carbohydrate products.

 

Total Carbohydrate Claims

NAD noted that the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) recognizes the variability in natural ingredients in the packaged food industry that leads to variations in nutritional content and makes allowances for the discrepancies that may result. Therefore, the FDA allows for a 20% variance from the amount of total carbohydrates declared on the label. 

NAD determined that while the testing provided by Olé shows that the total carbohydrate amount differs from that advertised on the product packaging, these differences fall within the range FDA deems reasonable. 

Accordingly, NAD found that the total carbohydrate amounts advertised on the product packaging and website for La Banderita and Xtreme Wellness tortillas are supported because they are within the variation allowed within the industry.

 

Net Carbohydrate Claims

Gruma also challenged Olé’s net carbohydrate claims including the express “net carbs per serving” declaration on the front and back of each tortilla’s packaging and the “effective carb count per tortilla” calculation on the back of each product’s packaging.

Considering the variation in nutritional makeup inherent in ingredients and the fact that the FDA and packaged food industry accept and acknowledge these variations, NAD found that Olé provided a reasonable basis for its net carbohydrate declarations and carb-effective calculations on certain La Banderita and Xtreme Wellness tortilla packaging. 

Regarding the claims on Olé’s La Banderita Carb Counter Street Taco tortilla packaging that it has “0 net carbs per serving” and is “keto net zero,” NAD determined that consumers would reasonably expect that “0 net carbs” claims mean that the product has less than .5 grams of net carbs. Therefore, NAD recommended that Olé discontinue any claims that its products have “0 net carbs per serving,” are “keto net zero,” and any effective carb count calculations that indicate 0 net carbohydrates per serving for any products that have more than .5 grams of net carbs.

 

Carb Lean Claim

NAD concluded that the term “Carb Lean” in the context of tortilla packaging reasonably conveys the message that the product is either low in total carbohydrates or low in net carbohydrates. In the absence of any explanation about how the carbohydrate numbers in Olé’s testing substantiate these claims, NAD recommended Olé discontinue the “Carb Lean” claim on certain product packaging and on the website. 

In its advertiser statement, Olé stated that it will “discontinue use of ‘carb lean’ claims” despite its disagreement with NAD’s conclusion and that it will “comply with NAD’s recommendation concerning making ‘zero net carb’ claims where it possesses substantiation consistent with FDA’s rounding rules.”

All BBB National Programs case decision summaries can be found in the case decision library. For the full text of NAD, NARB, and CARU decisions, subscribe to the online archivePer NAD Procedures, this release shall not be used for advertising or promotional purposes.

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

In National Advertising Division Challenge Admire Aesthetics Voluntarily Discontinues Claims for Compounded Tirzepatide

New York, NY – January 23, 2025 – In a BBB National Programs’ National Advertising Division challenge brought by Eli Lilly, Admire Aesthetics voluntarily discontinued certain advertising claims for its compounded tirzepatide product.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Finds Certain Claims for Brainiac Applesauce and Gummy Vitamins Supported; Recommends Others be Discontinued or Modified

New York, NY – January 22, 2025 – The National Advertising Division determined that Ingenuity Brands provided a reasonable basis for certain claims for its Brainiac Brain Squeezers Applesauce products and BrainPack Daily Adult Gummy Vitamins, but recommended other claims be discontinued or...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Procter & Gamble Modify or Discontinue Certain #1 Claims for Tide Free & Gentle

New York, NY – January 17, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended that P&G modify the claim “From Tide, the #1 brand used by dermatologists” when used in connection with imagery for Tide Free & Gentle and discontinue the related claim “From Tide, the #1 Trusted Detergent Brand for Sensitive...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue “Families Can Save 20% Every Month Versus AT&T and Verizon” Claim

New York, NY – January 16, 2025 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by competitor AT&T, BBB National Programs’ National Advertising Division recommended T-Mobile discontinue its claim for 20% savings on monthly wireless services. 

Read the Decision Summary