National Advertising Division Recommends Modification of Optimum Internet “Faster Download Speeds Than AT&T Nationwide” Claim
New York, NY – July 28, 2023 – In a challenge brought by AT&T Services, Inc., the National Advertising Division (NAD) of BBB National Programs recommended that Altice USA, Inc. modify its advertising to avoid conveying the message that it has faster download speeds than AT&T in markets where Optimum Internet competes with AT&T.
NAD determined that Altice’s claim, “Optimum has faster download speeds than AT&T nationwide,” in context, reasonably conveys the message that consumers will receive faster speeds nationwide if they switch to Optimum from AT&T, including where both services are available.
NAD noted that, unlike wireless internet, the comparative speed of two fixed internet networks is primarily meaningful to customers who are or plan to be located in a service area in which the two networks overlap.
NAD determined that Altice provided a reasonable basis for the challenged claim by relying on undisputed Ookla Speedtest data that it has faster speeds based on a nationwide average. However, more granular state-wide data submitted by AT&T raised concerns about the actual comparative speed of the two services when looking at their overlapping service area.
NAD concluded that claims of faster download speeds in markets where the services overlap were not substantiated.
NAD found that while Altice’s disclosure “based on analysis by Ookla of Speedtest Intelligence data comparing national median fixed download speeds of Optimum and AT&T Internet, Q4 2022,” does inform consumers of the source of the claim, it does not adequately explain that the claim does not compare speeds in areas where the two services overlap.
NAD recommended that Altice modify its advertising to avoid conveying the message that it has faster download speeds than AT&T in markets where Optimum Internet competes with AT&T.
In its advertiser statement, Altice stated that it “appreciates NAD’s recommendations and will take them into account in future advertising.”
All BBB National Programs case decision summaries can be found in the case decision library. For the full text of NAD, NARB, and CARU decisions, subscribe to the online archive. Per NAD Procedures, this release shall not be used for advertising or promotional purposes.
Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.
Latest Decisions
Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Refers Olive Tree Earnings Claims to the FTC and California AG for Possible Enforcement Action
McLean, VA – December 20, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) referred Olive Tree to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and California Attorney General's Office for possible enforcement action after Olive Tree failed to respond to a DSSRC inquiry into earnings claims.
Children’s Advertising Review Unit Recommends JustPlay Discontinue or Modify Daisy the Yoga Goat Claims
New York, NY – December 19, 2024 - The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU) launched an investigation into advertising for Just Play’s furReal Daisy the Yoga Goat seeking to determine if the toy’s product packaging and commercial advertisements comply with CARU’s Self-Regulatory Guidelines for Children’s Advertising.
In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge, Oral Essentials Voluntarily Modifies “Made in USA” Claims
New York, NY – December 19, 2024 – In a National Advertising Division challenge, Oral Essentials agreed to permanently modify its claim that certain Oral Essentials oral healthcare products are “Made in USA.”
National Advertising Division Recommends Zuru Modify or Discontinue Certain Claims for its Rascals and Millie Moon Diapers
New York, NY – December 18, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended Zuru Edge Limited modify or discontinue certain claims for its Rascals and Millie Moon diaper products.