National Advertising Review Board Recommends P&G Discontinue Odor Elimination Claims for Febreze Products
703-247-9330 / email@example.com
New York, NY – September 15, 2022 – A panel of the National Advertising Review Board (NARB), the appellate advertising law body of BBB National Programs, recommended that Procter & Gamble Company (P&G) discontinue certain “odor elimination” claims that P&G makes across its Febreze line of home fragrance products, which include the Febreze air, candle, car, plug, small spaces, and wax melts products.
The advertising at issue had been challenged before the National Advertising Division (NAD) by S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc., manufacturer of the competing line of Glade brand products. Following NAD’s decision ( Case No. 6977), P&G appealed NAD’s recommendation that it discontinue 19 express and two implied claims, many of which include express references to the ability of Febreze products to “eliminate” odors.
In agreement with NAD, the NARB Panel determined that air freshener claims that assert that the product “eliminates” odors should be held to a level of support high enough to show actual elimination or absence of odors, rather than simply odor reduction.
In support of its claims, the advertiser relied on sensory testing, known as Difference from Control (DFC) testing. The NARB Panel carefully reviewed the evidence concerning P&G’s DFC testing and concluded that it does not support the challenged odor-elimination claims due to several areas of concern.
Therefore, the NARB Panel recommended that P&G discontinue the challenged express and implied claims that Febreze eliminates odors, such as:
- “Febreze Air eliminates odors in an instant.”
- “Want to eliminate odors without heavy overwhelming scents? We get it. Introducing Febreze Light. It eliminates odors with no heavy perfumes in light scents you’ll love.”
- Febreze Fabric Refresher “eliminates sunk-in-stink with long-lasting freshness.”
The NARB Panel noted that nothing in its decision should be interpreted as indicating that P&G does not have proper support for claims of odor reduction for its Febreze products. In addition, the Panel concluded that P&G has sufficient documentation of its OdorClear technology to support mode-of-action claims that are not combined with odor-elimination claims, including claims of instantaneous or continuous action.
Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Refers Perfectly Posh Earnings Claims to the FTC and Utah Attorney General for Possible Enforcement Action
National Advertising Division Finds Certain Claims for T-Mobile Home Internet Supported; T-Mobile Appeals Determination That Certain Claims Were Unsupported
New York, NY – January 23, 2023 – In a challenge brought by Comcast, the National Advertising Division (NAD) determined that T-Mobile’s advertising provided a reasonable basis for its price lock claim and concluded that other challenged claims did not convey false or misleading...
National Advertising Division Recommends Cox Discontinue Implied Superior Reliability Claim for Cox Internet
New York, NY – January 19, 2023 – Acting on a challenge by AT&T Services, Inc., the National Advertising Division (NAD) recommended that Cox Communications, Inc. discontinue advertising that conveys the implied message that internet from competing services is glitchy and unreliable, but Cox Internet is not.
National Advertising Division Finds Novartis Breast Cancer Drug Claim Supported in Physician-Directed Messaging, But Not in Ads to Consumers
New York, NY – January 19, 2023 – The National Advertising Division (NAD) determined Novartis Pharmaceutical provided a reasonable basis for the claim that its Kisqali breast cancer treatment drug is “The only CDK4/6 inhibitor with statistically significant overall survival proven across 3 phase...