Primark Modifies its Advertising to Comply with Children’s Advertising Review Unit Guidelines

For Immediate Release 
Contact: Abby Hills, Director of Communications, BBB National Programs 

703.247.9330 / press@bbbnp.org 

McLean, VA – July 14, 2022 – The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU), a division of BBB National Programs, has determined that Primark US Corp.’s product advertising to children failed to comply with CARU’s Advertising Guidelines, specifically a new provision, which became effective in January of this year, stating that advertising should not portray or encourage negative social stereotyping, prejudice, or discrimination. CARU recommended that the advertiser modify its gender-restrictive advertising and Primark has agreed to the modifications.   

This case involves advertising messages on Primark children’s clothing that CARU determined to be directed to children under age 13, making them subject to CARU’s Advertising Guidelines. The Primark advertisements in question, which appeared on the Primark website, on social media, and on in-store advertising came to CARU’s attention through its routine monitoring of child-directed advertising in the marketplace.

Some representative examples of the advertised messages include:

  • Slogans on shirts advertised to girls such as “Be Kind, Be Happy,” “Kindness always wins,” “Always Perfect,” “Grateful, humble and optimistic,” and “Be good, do good.”
  • Slogans on shirts advertised to boys such as "Change the game,” “Born to win,” “Power,” “Champion,” “Total Icon,” and “Awesome Adventures.” 

 

CARU’s inquiry assessed the messaging to children resulting from these gender-restrictive slogans. CARU found that Primark’s separate lines of messaging advertised to girls and boys created a dichotomous world of goals and attributes – those appropriate for girls and those appropriate for boys – that portrayed or encouraged negative stereotyping, prejudice, or discrimination. 

Based on these findings, CARU recommended that Primark’s product advertising be modified so that the messages do not portray or encourage negative stereotyping, prejudice, or discrimination. CARU further recommended that Primark advertising be respectful of human dignity and diversity. 

Primark agreed to comply with CARU’s recommendations, informing CARU that it had already begun an internal review of issues of gender, race and ethnicity, physical and intellectual disabilities, and other personal characteristics relating to its children’s clothing and campaign imagery to ensure its products, sales, and marketing efforts reflect the company’s values of inclusivity. Primark has made several changes based on CARU’s recommendations and has indicated it plans to continue improvements to how it develops, promotes, and displays its products advertised to children.  

All BBB National Programs case decision summaries can be found in the case decision library. For the full text of NAD, NARB, and CARU decisions, subscribe to the online archive.

Latest Decisions

Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Zilis Discontinue Health-Related Product Performance Claims

McLean, VA – December 1, 2022 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended that health-related product performance claims made by Zilis salesforce members be discontinued. 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Finds Blue Apron’s “Canceling Meals is Easy” Claim Supported

New York, NY – December 1, 2022 – In a National Advertising Division (NAD) challenge, brought as part of NAD’s routine monitoring of national advertising for truth and transparency, NAD has determined that Blue Apron LLC provided a reasonable basis for the claim that “Canceling Meals is Easy.” 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Finds Certain Perrigo Infant Formula Cost Savings Claims Supported; Recommends Others be Modified or Discontinued

New York, NY – November 30, 2022 – The National Advertising Division (NAD) determined that Perrigo Company plc provided a reasonable basis for certain cost savings claims for its store brand hypoallergenic infant formula but recommended that other challenged claims be modified or...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Refers Comparative Advertising Claims made by Zscaler to Federal Trade Commission for Further Review

New York, NY – November 30, 2022 – The National Advertising Division (NAD) referred Zscaler to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) after the company failed to respond substantively to a challenge into claims made for its Zero Trust Exchange Platform. NAD recommended that Zscaler discontinue claims about...

Read the Decision Summary