National Advertising Division Finds Certain HEPA Claims for PuroAir 400 Air Purifiers and Filters Supported

New York, NY – October 23, 2024 – In a challenge brought by competitor Vesync Corporation d/b/a Levoit, BBB National Programs’ National Advertising Division determined that Yalla Ventures, Inc. d/b/a PuroAir provided a reasonable basis for claims that its PuroAir 400 air purifiers and filters have passed high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) standards.

The challenged HEPA claims appeared on PuroAir 400 packaging, Amazon storefronts, and PuroAir webpages.

The National Advertising Division (NAD) has noted in previous cases that, in the U.S., HEPA is generally defined as a filter’s ability to capture 99.97% of airborne particles that are 0.3 microns in size. NAD determined that reasonable consumers would view HEPA-advertised products as having met this minimum standard regardless of their ultimate use (whether consumer, medical, or industrial).

NAD determined that the submitted testing of PuroAir 400 filters provided a reasonable basis that the PuroAir 400 air purifiers’ filters can capture 99.97% of airborne particles that are 0.3 microns in size, and as a result determined that Puro Air has a reasonable basis for claims that its PuroAir 400 air purifiers and filters have passed HEPA standards.

During the proceeding, PuroAir permanently discontinued certain claims for its air purifier and filter products. Therefore, NAD did not review these claims on their merits and will treat the claims, for compliance purposes, as though NAD recommended they be discontinued.

In its advertiser statement, PuroAir stated that it “appreciates NAD’s careful consideration of the issues presented and will comply with NAD’s decision.”

All BBB National Programs case decision summaries can be found in the case decision library. For the full text of NAD, NARB, and CARU decisions, subscribe to the online archive. Per NAD/NARB procedures, this release shall not be used for advertising or promotional purposes.

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Finds Certain HEPA Claims for PuroAir 400 Air Purifiers and Filters Supported

New York, NY – October 23, 2024 – In a challenge brought by competitor Levoit, the National Advertising Division determined PuroAir provided a reasonable basis for claims that its PuroAir 400 air purifiers and filters have passed high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) standards.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Dudley Beauty Discontinue Earnings Claims

McLean, VA – October 21, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended Dudley Beauty discontinue certain earnings claims made on Facebook, Twitter/X, YouTube, Pinterest, and the company website.  

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Comcast Discontinue or Modify Comcast Business Internet’s “12x Faster” Claim

New York, NY – October 17, 2024 – In a challenge brought by AT&T, the National Advertising Division (NAD) recommended Comcast, in connection with Comcast Business Internet discontinue or modify the claim “Comcast Business Internet has speeds up to 12x faster than Verizon, AT&T, and T-Mobile.”

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Case, Reckitt Voluntarily Discontinued “#1 Recommended” Claim for Finish Dishwashing Detergent

New York, NY – October 16, 2024 – The National Advertising Division has closed a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge initiated by P&G following the voluntary discontinuation of claims made by Reckitt Benckiser that its Finish dishwashing detergent is the “#1 Recommended in America.”

Read the Decision Summary