National Advertising Division Finds Certain HEPA Claims for PuroAir 400 Air Purifiers and Filters Supported

New York, NY – October 23, 2024 – In a challenge brought by competitor Vesync Corporation d/b/a Levoit, BBB National Programs’ National Advertising Division determined that Yalla Ventures, Inc. d/b/a PuroAir provided a reasonable basis for claims that its PuroAir 400 air purifiers and filters have passed high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) standards.

The challenged HEPA claims appeared on PuroAir 400 packaging, Amazon storefronts, and PuroAir webpages.

The National Advertising Division (NAD) has noted in previous cases that, in the U.S., HEPA is generally defined as a filter’s ability to capture 99.97% of airborne particles that are 0.3 microns in size. NAD determined that reasonable consumers would view HEPA-advertised products as having met this minimum standard regardless of their ultimate use (whether consumer, medical, or industrial).

NAD determined that the submitted testing of PuroAir 400 filters provided a reasonable basis that the PuroAir 400 air purifiers’ filters can capture 99.97% of airborne particles that are 0.3 microns in size, and as a result determined that Puro Air has a reasonable basis for claims that its PuroAir 400 air purifiers and filters have passed HEPA standards.

During the proceeding, PuroAir permanently discontinued certain claims for its air purifier and filter products. Therefore, NAD did not review these claims on their merits and will treat the claims, for compliance purposes, as though NAD recommended they be discontinued.

In its advertiser statement, PuroAir stated that it “appreciates NAD’s careful consideration of the issues presented and will comply with NAD’s decision.”

All BBB National Programs case decision summaries can be found in the case decision library. For the full text of NAD, NARB, and CARU decisions, subscribe to the online archive. Per NAD/NARB procedures, this release shall not be used for advertising or promotional purposes.

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

NAD Finds Patented and Safety Claims for POOPH’s Pet Odor & Stain Eliminator Supported; Recommends Other Claims Be Modified or Discontinued

New York, NY – November 21, 2024 – The National Advertising Division determined that Ikigai supported patented and safety claims for their POOPH Pet Odor & Stain Eliminator, but recommended that other claims, including claims that POOPH eliminates odors and strains, be discontinued.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends SharkNinja Discontinue Certain Best Deep Carpet Cleaning Claims

New York, NY – November 19, 2024 – BBB National Programs’ National Advertising Division recommended that SharkNinja discontinue the claim “The Best Deep Carpet Cleaning Among Full-Sized Deep Carpet Cleaners** Based on ASTM F2828 vs. full-sized carpet cleaners above 14 lbs.”     

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify Advertising for Free iPhone and 20% Savings Claim; T-Mobile to Appeal

New York, NY – November 18, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge, the National Advertising Division recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its advertising offering a free iPhone and 20% savings on monthly wireless services to better disclose the material conditions of the offer.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Finds Realtor.com “#1 Site Real Estate Professionals Trust” Claim Supported

New York, NY – November 8, 2024 – In a challenge brought by competitor CoStar Group, the National Advertising Division determined that Move provided a reasonable basis for its claim that Realtor.com is the “#1 site real estate professionals trust.

Read the Decision Summary