Routine Wellness Discontinues Advertising Claims for Shampoo and Conditioner Following National Advertising Division Challenge

New York, NY – March 14, 2023 – As part of the National Advertising Division (NAD) of the BBB National Programs routine monitoring of national advertising for truth and transparency, NAD inquired about claims recommending hair care products of Routine Wellness Inc. During the pendency of the inquiry, Routine Wellness voluntarily discontinued advertising claims regarding its shampoo and conditioner. 

NAD inquired about the advertiser’s Facebook and Instagram posts that linked to an article on the lifestyle blog My Best Self that reviewed and recommended Routine Wellness shampoo and conditioner. 

Although the review was independently authored by the My Best Self editorial staff based on the author’s personal experiences and opinions, NAD has long held that when an advertiser quotes, restates, links to, or otherwise disseminates claims made about its product by a third party, those same third-party claims become advertising claims made by the advertiser for which the advertiser must have substantiation.  This is true even when the advertiser has not paid for, sponsored, approved, or controlled the third party’s claims about the advertiser’s product.  

NAD found that when Routine Wellness linked its social media post to the review, claims made about Routine Wellness’s hair care products in the review (e.g., “5 Best Shampoos for Women with Thin Hair”) became advertising claims of Routine Wellness for which Routine Wellness must have a reasonable basis of support.  

During the proceeding, Routine Wellness informed NAD that it had permanently discontinued the post and dissemination of the review. Therefore, NAD did not review the claim on its merits.

In its advertiser statement, Routine wellness thanked NAD for its “careful review of this matter” and stated that it is “pleased with NAD’s decision and will comply with its recommendations.”

All BBB National Programs case decision summaries can be found in the case decision library. For the full text of NAD, NARB, and CARU decisions, subscribe to the online archive.

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

NAD Finds Certain Claims for Mott’s Fruit Flavored Snacks Supported or Outside NAD’s Jurisdiction; Recommends General Mills Discontinue or Modify Other Claims

New York, NY – November 25, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended that General Mills discontinue or modify certain express and implied claims regarding the fruit and vegetable content of Mott’s Fruit Flavored Snacks and the nutritional benefits of those ingredients.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

In National Advertising Division Challenge, Drip Hydration Voluntarily Discontinues Claims for its Ketamine IV Therapy

New York, NY – November 22, 2024 – Following a challenge brought by the National Advertising Division as part of its routine monitoring program, Drip Hydration voluntarily discontinued advertising claims for its Drip Hydration Ketamine IV Therapy.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

NAD Finds Patented and Safety Claims for POOPH’s Pet Odor & Stain Eliminator Supported; Recommends Other Claims Be Modified or Discontinued

New York, NY – November 21, 2024 – The National Advertising Division determined that Ikigai supported patented and safety claims for their POOPH Pet Odor & Stain Eliminator, but recommended that other claims, including claims that POOPH eliminates odors and strains, be discontinued.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends SharkNinja Discontinue Certain Best Deep Carpet Cleaning Claims

New York, NY – November 19, 2024 – BBB National Programs’ National Advertising Division recommended that SharkNinja discontinue the claim “The Best Deep Carpet Cleaning Among Full-Sized Deep Carpet Cleaners** Based on ASTM F2828 vs. full-sized carpet cleaners above 14 lbs.”     

Read the Decision Summary