Schering-Plough, Novartis Participate In NAD Forum
New York, NY – June 19, 2007 – The National Advertising Division (NAD) of the Council of Better Business Bureaus has recommended that Schering-Plough Healthcare Products, Inc., modify certain claims for Lotrimin Ultra, a treatment for athlete’s foot. Television advertising claims for Lotrimin Ultra were challenged by Novartis Consumer Healthcare, Inc., the maker of Lamisil Defense, a competing product.
NAD, the advertising industry’s self-regulatory forum, examined advertising claims that included:
- “Why live with athlete’s foot? The itching, the burning. Lotrimin Ultra treats most athlete’s foot in just one week’s use.”
- “New Lamisil Defense, four long weeks.”
- “Lotrimin Ultra is so powerful nothing cures faster.”
- “Lotrimin Ultra, the one week killer cure.”
NAD noted in its decision that the commercial and the results of a consumer-perception survey offered by the challenger highlight an issue NAD has considered in prior athlete’s foot cases – whether consumers believe that the word “cure” refers to the elimination of the underlying fungus and the symptoms of athlete’s foot, or whether it refers only to the relief of symptoms.
In this case, NAD determined that the commercial’s text and visuals “link the treatment of athlete’s foot to the symptoms and convey to consumers that they can achieve relief from the itching and burning of athlete’s foot with Lotrimin Ultra in one week but need to wait four long weeks for the same relief with Lamisil Defense” when, in fact, all approved athlete’s foot products relieve athlete’s foot symptoms – itching, burning – within a week.
Following its review of the evidence, NAD determined that the performance and efficacy claims in the commercial (Lotrimin Ultra treats most athlete’s foot in just one week’s use; Lotrimin Ultra is so powerful that nothing cures faster) were appropriate, NAD recommended, however, that Schering-Plough modify its commercial to avoid conveying the unsupported message that Lotrimin Ultra provides faster relief from athlete’s foot symptoms than Lamisil Defense, though it may compare the length of the courses of treatment.
Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.
Latest Decisions
National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify 20% Savings vs. ‘The Other Big Guys’ Claim; T-Mobile to Appeal
New York, NY – January 9, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its advertising to avoid conveying the comparative claim that consumers can “save 20% every month vs. the other big guys” if they subscribe to T-Mobile in markets where Spectrum Mobile also...
In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge Behr Voluntarily Discontinues “No Comparable Product” Claim
New York, NY – January 8, 2025 – In a National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by Benjamin Moore, Behr voluntarily discontinued its “No Comparable Product” claim.
National Advertising Division Finds Charter’s “Unlimited” Claims Supported; Recommends Clear & Conspicuous Speed Limitation Disclosures
New York, NY – January 7, 2025 – The National Advertising Division found that Charter substantiated certain express and implied claims about its Spectrum Mobile “Unlimited” and “Unlimited Plus” wireless data plans but recommended that Charter modify its website advertising to disclose high speed data...
National Advertising Division Recommends Solawave Discontinue Certain Claims for its Advanced Skincare Wand
New York, NY – January 6, 2025 – As part of its routine monitoring process, the National Advertising Division recommended Solawave discontinue certain express and implied claims for its SolaWave Advanced Skincare Wand.