National Advertising Division Recommends SharkNinja Discontinue Claim that SpeedStyle Hair Dryer Results in “Up to 6x Less Frizz”
New York, NY – November 16, 2023 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by Dyson, Inc., the National Advertising Division (NAD) of BBB National Programs recommended that SharkNinja Operating, LLC discontinue the claim that its SpeedStyle hair dryer results in “up to 6x less frizz” versus air drying.
Fast-Track SWIFT is an expedited process designed for single-issue advertising cases brought to NAD.
The challenged claim, that use of the SpeedStyle with its RapidGloss Finisher styling attachment results in “up to 6x less frizz,” appeared in various places on Shark’s website and is accompanied by a disclosure that the comparison is “*vs. air-drying, based on a 600-person survey.” At issue for NAD was whether the survey Shark conducted was a good fit for the claim.
NAD determined that Shark’s survey was not a good fit for a claim touting a quantified reduction in the amount of frizz because it did not measure a numeric reduction in the amount of frizz through either objective measurement or subjective observations. Rather, the survey recorded whether the participants observed the presence or absence of “frizz” after air drying or after drying hair with the Shark SpeedStyle and the RapidGloss attachment.
Therefore, NAD recommended Shark discontinue the “up to 6x less frizz” versus air drying claim but noted that nothing in its decision precludes Shark from making other supported claims relating to the perception of frizz based on a reliable survey.
In its advertiser statement, Shark stated that it “will comply with NAD’s decision” although it “disagrees with NAD’s finding that Shark’s evidence was not a good fit for the claim that Shark SpeedStyle with RapidGloss finisher can result in up to 6 times less frizz as compared to air drying.”
All BBB National Programs case decision summaries can be found in the case decision library. For the full text of NAD, NARB, and CARU decisions, subscribe to the online archive. Per NAD/NARB procedures, this release shall not be used for advertising or promotional purposes.
Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.
Latest Decisions
National Advertising Division Recommends Dr. Luke Healthcare Discontinue Treatment Claims for its Fungal Nail Renewal Product
New York, NY – July 24, 2024 – The National Advertising Division recommended Dr. Luke Healthcare discontinue certain claims for Dr. Luke’s Fungal Nail Renewal product, including health-related claims, natural claims, and claims that a doctor recommends the product or that it treats a medical condition.
National Advertising Division Finds Flag Image on Kendamil Infant Formula Packaging Conveys Supported Message about Products’ Origin
New York, NY – July 17, 2024 – In a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge, the National Advertising Division determined that use of a flag image on product packaging for Kendal Nutricare’s Kendamil infant formula reasonably conveys a supported message about the products’ origin.
In National Advertising Division Case, GuruNanda Voluntarily Discontinues Claims Made through Influencers for Coconut Pulling Oil Products
New York, NY – July 16, 2024 – The National Advertising Division has closed a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge regarding claims that GuruNanda’s coconut pulling oil products can “naturally reverse a cavity” and “reverse cavities.”
National Advertising Division Refers Health-Related Advertising Claims for Prolacta’s Human Milk Fortifier to Regulatory Agencies
New York, NY – July 15, 2024 – The National Advertising Division will refer advertising claims made by Prolacta Bioscience for its Human Milk Fortifier to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for review.