National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue Most Reliable 5G Network According to umlaut Claims

New York, NY – March 23, 2023 – In a challenge brought by AT&T Services, Inc., the National Advertising Division (NAD) of BBB National Programs recommended that T-Mobile, U.S., Inc. discontinue advertising claims that its wireless service has the most reliable 5G network according to the third-party testing company, umlaut. 

Prior NAD and BBB National Programs’ National Advertising Review Board (NARB) cases have established that in the context of wireless networks, at least one component of a network reliability analysis should be task completion. The 5G Transaction Success Metric in umlaut’s reports conducted in May 2022 and July 2022 uses four different tests to assess whether consumers can complete different tasks on each carrier’s network.  

NAD evaluated whether the four tests measure reliability in a way that reflects real-life consumer experience and reflects how consumers understand reliability. After considering each of the 4 tests, NAD found that it could not determine with certainty that umlaut’s 5G Transaction Success Metric accurately measures task completion in a consumer-relevant way. 

NAD determined that umlaut’s testing is not a good fit for the reliability claim at issue and recommended that T-Mobile discontinue its “most reliable 5G network” claim according to umlaut and all similar challenged claims. 

NAD also recommended that T-Mobile discontinue the claim “[I]ndependent experts from across the industry have sent a clear message time and time again: there’s one network leader and it’s T-Mobile” with regards to a superior reliability message. NAD noted that its decision does not prevent T-Mobile from touting they are a network leader in respects other than reliability if properly supported. 

In its advertiser statement, T-Mobile stated that it is proud of its 5G network and the awards it has received. It expressed its disappointment with NAD’s decision but stated that it “remains a supporter of the self-regulatory process and will comply with NAD’s recommendations.” 

All BBB National Programs case decision summaries can be found in the case decision library. For the full text of NAD, NARB, and CARU decisions, subscribe to the online archive.

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends Valentus Discontinue Earnings and Product Performance Claims

McLean, VA – December 23, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended Valentus, a direct selling company that sells nutritional and lifestyle products, discontinue earnings and health-related product performance claims made on social media and on the Valentus website.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Refers Olive Tree Earnings Claims to the FTC and California AG for Possible Enforcement Action

McLean, VA – December 20, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) referred Olive Tree to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and California Attorney General's Office for possible enforcement action after Olive Tree failed to respond to a DSSRC inquiry into earnings claims.  

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Children’s Advertising Review Unit Recommends JustPlay Discontinue or Modify Daisy the Yoga Goat Claims

New York, NY – December 19, 2024 - The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU) launched an investigation into advertising for Just Play’s furReal Daisy the Yoga Goat seeking to determine if the toy’s product packaging and commercial advertisements comply with CARU’s Self-Regulatory Guidelines for Children’s Advertising.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge, Oral Essentials Voluntarily Modifies “Made in USA” Claims

New York, NY – December 19, 2024 – In a National Advertising Division challenge, Oral Essentials agreed to permanently modify its claim that certain Oral Essentials oral healthcare products are “Made in USA.” 

Read the Decision Summary