Target Corp. Participates In NAD Forum

New York, NY – July 31, 2007 – The National Advertising Division (NAD) of the Council of Better Business Bureaus has determined that text included on packaging for  Target Moisturizing Scar Lotion by Target Corporation does not represent an advertising claim that requires substantiation.

NAD, the advertising industry’s self-regulatory forum, specifically examined the use of the language “Compare to Mederma” on packaging for the Target product and requested that Target provide a substantive response to the inquiry.

Target contended that the statement at issue, “Compare to Mederma” is an invitation to consumers to try its product and compare it to Mederma Skin Care for Scars, rather than an advertising claim requiring substantiation. 

Following its review of the packaging, NAD determined that, in the context presented,  the stand-alone phrase “Compare to Mederma” is not a parity claim that  suggests Target Greaseless Moisturizing Scar Lotion is the equivalent to MEDERMA Skin Care for Scars in composition and effectiveness but, rather, that consumers would reasonably interpret the “Compare to Mederma” statement to be merely an “invitation” to compare the products.

Target, in its advertiser’s statement, said Target it “appreciates NAD’s important role in the self-regulatory process.”

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends T-Mobile Discontinue or Modify 20% Savings vs. ‘The Other Big Guys’ Claim; T-Mobile to Appeal

New York, NY – January 9, 2025 – The National Advertising Division recommended that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its advertising to avoid conveying the comparative claim that consumers can “save 20% every month vs. the other big guys” if they subscribe to T-Mobile in markets where Spectrum Mobile also...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

In National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT Challenge Behr Voluntarily Discontinues “No Comparable Product” Claim

New York, NY – January 8, 2025 – In a National Advertising Division Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by Benjamin Moore, Behr voluntarily discontinued its “No Comparable Product” claim.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Finds Charter’s “Unlimited” Claims Supported; Recommends Clear & Conspicuous Speed Limitation Disclosures

New York, NY – January 7, 2025 – The National Advertising Division found that Charter substantiated certain express and implied claims about its Spectrum Mobile “Unlimited” and “Unlimited Plus” wireless data plans but recommended that Charter modify its website advertising to disclose high speed data...

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Solawave Discontinue Certain Claims for its Advanced Skincare Wand

New York, NY – January 6, 2025 – As part of its routine monitoring process, the National Advertising Division recommended Solawave discontinue certain express and implied claims for its SolaWave Advanced Skincare Wand.

Read the Decision Summary