Target Corp. Participates In NAD Forum

New York, NY – July 31, 2007 – The National Advertising Division (NAD) of the Council of Better Business Bureaus has determined that text included on packaging for  Target Moisturizing Scar Lotion by Target Corporation does not represent an advertising claim that requires substantiation.

NAD, the advertising industry’s self-regulatory forum, specifically examined the use of the language “Compare to Mederma” on packaging for the Target product and requested that Target provide a substantive response to the inquiry.

Target contended that the statement at issue, “Compare to Mederma” is an invitation to consumers to try its product and compare it to Mederma Skin Care for Scars, rather than an advertising claim requiring substantiation. 

Following its review of the packaging, NAD determined that, in the context presented,  the stand-alone phrase “Compare to Mederma” is not a parity claim that  suggests Target Greaseless Moisturizing Scar Lotion is the equivalent to MEDERMA Skin Care for Scars in composition and effectiveness but, rather, that consumers would reasonably interpret the “Compare to Mederma” statement to be merely an “invitation” to compare the products.

Target, in its advertiser’s statement, said Target it “appreciates NAD’s important role in the self-regulatory process.”

 

Subscribe to the Ad Law Insights or Privacy Initiatives newsletters for an exclusive monthly analysis and insider perspectives on the latest trends and case decisions in advertising law and data privacy.

 

 

 

 

Latest Decisions

Decision

Following National Advertising Division Inquiry, Google Voluntarily Unlists Video Demonstrating Google Gemini Capabilities

New York, NY – September 12, 2024 – Google voluntarily unlisted a video demonstrating the capabilities of Google Gemini, its large language model artificial intelligence (AI) offering introduced in December 2023.

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Recommends Gruma Modify Sugar and Net Carbohydrate Label Claims

New York, NY – September 11, 2024 – In a challenge brought by competitor Olé, the National Advertising Division found certain “zero sugar” and “0G sugar” claims supported and recommended that Gruma Corporation, in connection with its tortilla product offerings, modify or discontinue other claims. 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends MONAT Discontinue Earnings Claims

McLean, VA – September 5, 2024 – The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) recommended MONAT Global discontinue certain earnings claims made on the MONAT website and by salesforce members on Facebook, Twitter/X, Instagram, and YouTube. 

Read the Decision Summary
Decision

National Advertising Division Refers HiSmile Teeth Whitening Product Claims to the Federal Trade Commission

New York, NY – August 29, 2024 – The National Advertising Division referred HiSmile to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and other regulatory authorities for review after HiSmile declined to provide an advertiser statement confirming it will comply with all of NAD’s recommendations.
Read the Decision Summary